Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi

dc.contributor.advisorMooya, Manya Mainza
dc.contributor.authorKabanga, Lucky
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T07:10:53Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T07:10:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-02-16T09:59:24Z
dc.description.abstractProviding various public infrastructure requires a lot of land that is normally expropriated from private and/or customary owners as government may not have it, in return for compensation to cover the expropriatory losses occasioned. Commonly, such compensation is assessed based on market value. While private land is tradable, customary land is conceptually and statutorily not. Essentially, the study examines how expropriated customary land is valued for compensation purposes. It argues that existing compensation valuation practices for expropriation presupposes private property and functional property markets, thereby realising inadequate compensation for customary land. By doing so, the study analyses applicability of indemnity and taker's gain compensation theories and methodologies that are founded on private land, to customary properties and in different social settings, to achieve desired compensation goals. The study uses three case studies in Malawi to collect empirical data through face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions from sixty respondents that included key informants, expropriatees, government officials, government valuers, private valuers, local leaders, development partner and civil society organisations representatives. Qualitative data were analysed qualitatively through thematic analysis and simple descriptive analysis for quantitative data. The study finds that Malawian compensation law derives from indemnity compensation theory but that its applicability to customary land is challenged by various factors including inadequate and unsupportive laws, underdeveloped or non-existent land markets to support adopted market value-based methodologies, customary land prevalence, absence of assessment methodologies for non-tradable or rarely exchanged properties and noncompensation of various expropriatory losses. The study concludes that indemnity compensation is fundamentally applicable to customary land as it desires to protect land rights from arbitrary takings and prevent expropriatees from impoverishment, but that current compensation practices obtain inadequate compensation that impoverishes expropriatees. This calls for other non-market dependent compensation assessment methodologies such as Contingent Valuation Methodology. The study makes a contribution to knowledge regarding the compensation of customary land acquired compulsorily, in the areas of theory, empirical data and policy development.
dc.identifier.apacitationKabanga, L. (2021). <i>Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi</i>. (). ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Construction Economics and Management. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationKabanga, Lucky. <i>"Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi."</i> ., ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Construction Economics and Management, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationKabanga, L. 2021. Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi. . ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Construction Economics and Management. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Doctoral Thesis AU - Kabanga, Lucky AB - Providing various public infrastructure requires a lot of land that is normally expropriated from private and/or customary owners as government may not have it, in return for compensation to cover the expropriatory losses occasioned. Commonly, such compensation is assessed based on market value. While private land is tradable, customary land is conceptually and statutorily not. Essentially, the study examines how expropriated customary land is valued for compensation purposes. It argues that existing compensation valuation practices for expropriation presupposes private property and functional property markets, thereby realising inadequate compensation for customary land. By doing so, the study analyses applicability of indemnity and taker's gain compensation theories and methodologies that are founded on private land, to customary properties and in different social settings, to achieve desired compensation goals. The study uses three case studies in Malawi to collect empirical data through face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions from sixty respondents that included key informants, expropriatees, government officials, government valuers, private valuers, local leaders, development partner and civil society organisations representatives. Qualitative data were analysed qualitatively through thematic analysis and simple descriptive analysis for quantitative data. The study finds that Malawian compensation law derives from indemnity compensation theory but that its applicability to customary land is challenged by various factors including inadequate and unsupportive laws, underdeveloped or non-existent land markets to support adopted market value-based methodologies, customary land prevalence, absence of assessment methodologies for non-tradable or rarely exchanged properties and noncompensation of various expropriatory losses. The study concludes that indemnity compensation is fundamentally applicable to customary land as it desires to protect land rights from arbitrary takings and prevent expropriatees from impoverishment, but that current compensation practices obtain inadequate compensation that impoverishes expropriatees. This calls for other non-market dependent compensation assessment methodologies such as Contingent Valuation Methodology. The study makes a contribution to knowledge regarding the compensation of customary land acquired compulsorily, in the areas of theory, empirical data and policy development. DA - 2021_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Construction Economics and Management LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2021 T1 - Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi TI - Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationKabanga L. Compensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi. []. ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Construction Economics and Management, 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35772en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Construction Economics and Management
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
dc.subjectConstruction Economics and Management
dc.titleCompensation assessment practices in expropriation of customary land rights in Malawi
dc.typeDoctoral Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationlevelPhD
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_ebe_2021_kabanga lucky.pdf
Size:
1.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections