Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity

dc.contributor.advisorJarvis, Jennifer UMen_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorBennett, Nigel Cen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorSpinks, Andrew Charlesen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-29T16:08:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-29T16:08:22Z
dc.date.issued1998en_ZA
dc.date.updated2016-12-14T14:18:12Z
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses the extrinsic factors which have shaped the evolution and maintenance of sociality in the African mole-rats. Specifically, the common mole-rat was used as a model to assess the Aridity Food-Distribution Hypothesis (AFDH), as an explanation for the evolution of bathyergid sociality. The AFDH correlates mole-rat sociality with habitat aridity and the pattern of food distribution. Aspects relating to ecological constraints, foraging behaviour, population demography, reproductive biology and aggressive behaviour were compared between an arid and a mesic population of C. h. hottentotus, to assess how inter-habitat divergence in ecological attributes has influenced social behaviour within these two populations. In evaluating the AFDH as an explanation for the evolution of sociality within C. h. · hottentotus two broad questions were addressed: (1) do the assumptions of the AFDH hold true i.e. do arid and mesic habitats exhibit ecological differences, specifically with regard to the pattern of resource dispersion and the energetic costs of foraging, which influence foraging risks and consequently the costs of dispersal? and (2) do these inter-habitat differences have implications for bathyergid social evolution i.e. do the common mole-rat populations inhabiting arid and mesic areas exhibit regional differentiation in social behaviour? Substantial inter-site divergence in ecological characteristics, notably climate and resource attributes, were revealed in this study. Rainfall at the arid site was markedly lower and more sporadic, and evaporation levels significantly higher, than at the mesic site. Moreover, thermal constraints were more limiting at the arid site. These features will greatly elevate the costs of soil excavation and the risks of hyperthermia, severely restricting the occurrence of suitable burrowing opportunities at the arid locality. Consequently, foraging will be severely constrained in this area. At the mesic site, higher, more predictable rainfall, low evaporation rates and reduced thermal constraints will translate into more suitable burrowing opportunities for much, if not all, of the year. Regional differentiation in food resource characteristics was also evident. Although geophytes were clumped at both study localities, the density of geophytes was lower and the distance between geophytes or geophyte clumps concomitantly greater at the arid relative to the mesic site. Differences in resource dispersion in turn influenced the patterns of foraging. In response to the low geophyte density and associated longer foraging distances, burrow systems were notably longer and more linear at the arid site. Furthermore, food storage and in situ harvesting were essential components of cooperative foraging in C. h. hottentotus as they minimised the risks of starvation, particularly in arid habitats. Thus, resource characteristics together with the climatic restrictions on burrowing in arid areas may have a marked impact on foraging behaviour, imposing severe constraints on the mole-rats occurring there and ultimately shaping their foraging responses. Together, these factors satisfactorily account for the underlying premise of the AFDH, that arid and mesic habitats exhibit ecological differences with regard to the pattern of resource dispersion and the energetic costs of foraging, which are likely to influence foraging risks and the costs of dispersal. In evaluating the AFDH, the second question which needed to be addressed was whether the study populations exhibited divergence in their social behaviour. The populations revealed no differences in absolute group size or in reproductive characteristics which were related to the effects of aridity per se. However, distinct inter-population divergence was readily apparent in phenotypically plastic traits such as dispersal behaviour and xenophobia. Clear differences were evident between the arid and mesic sites in both the quantitative and qualitative nature of dispersal; dispersal was markedly constrained at the arid site and colonies demonstrated greater temporal stability, with more predictable temporal group membership. The ecological constraints on successful foraging at the arid site will curb opportunities for dispersal and promote cooperation in the C. h. hottentotus occurring there. Colony members should therefore maximise their inclusive fitness by natal philopatry, delayed dispersal and cooperative foraging. Inter-site differences were also apparent in the response of colony members to foreign conspecifics. Common mole-rats from the arid site were markedly more xenophobic than those from the mesic site, and aggressively rejected foreigners. For arid-occurring populations, the fitness penalties for failing to exclude foreigners from the colony burrow system and associated resources, will be more severe than for mesic-occurring populations, resulting in heightened levels of xenophobia. Again, colony cohesion and cooperation in arid areas are essential to individual survival and inclusive fitness. The regional differences in dispersal patterns and xenophobia revealed in this investigation may reflect adaptive variation in social behaviour between the study populations, and the results suggest that delayed dispersal and cooperation may be more crucial to individual survival in arid than in mesic areas. As such these findings provide support for the underlying contention of the AFDH that ecological constraints on foraging in arid areas have promoted a greater degree of social elaboration in mole-rats occurring there. This study provides persuasive support for the AFDH as an explanation for the adaptive significance of social behaviour and cooperation in the common mole-rat, and together with other investigations, suggests that the AFDH provides a valid explanation for the evolution of group-living in the Bathyergidae.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationSpinks, A. C. (1998). <i>Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23681en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationSpinks, Andrew Charles. <i>"Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23681en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSpinks, A. 1998. Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity. University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Spinks, Andrew Charles AB - This study addresses the extrinsic factors which have shaped the evolution and maintenance of sociality in the African mole-rats. Specifically, the common mole-rat was used as a model to assess the Aridity Food-Distribution Hypothesis (AFDH), as an explanation for the evolution of bathyergid sociality. The AFDH correlates mole-rat sociality with habitat aridity and the pattern of food distribution. Aspects relating to ecological constraints, foraging behaviour, population demography, reproductive biology and aggressive behaviour were compared between an arid and a mesic population of C. h. hottentotus, to assess how inter-habitat divergence in ecological attributes has influenced social behaviour within these two populations. In evaluating the AFDH as an explanation for the evolution of sociality within C. h. · hottentotus two broad questions were addressed: (1) do the assumptions of the AFDH hold true i.e. do arid and mesic habitats exhibit ecological differences, specifically with regard to the pattern of resource dispersion and the energetic costs of foraging, which influence foraging risks and consequently the costs of dispersal? and (2) do these inter-habitat differences have implications for bathyergid social evolution i.e. do the common mole-rat populations inhabiting arid and mesic areas exhibit regional differentiation in social behaviour? Substantial inter-site divergence in ecological characteristics, notably climate and resource attributes, were revealed in this study. Rainfall at the arid site was markedly lower and more sporadic, and evaporation levels significantly higher, than at the mesic site. Moreover, thermal constraints were more limiting at the arid site. These features will greatly elevate the costs of soil excavation and the risks of hyperthermia, severely restricting the occurrence of suitable burrowing opportunities at the arid locality. Consequently, foraging will be severely constrained in this area. At the mesic site, higher, more predictable rainfall, low evaporation rates and reduced thermal constraints will translate into more suitable burrowing opportunities for much, if not all, of the year. Regional differentiation in food resource characteristics was also evident. Although geophytes were clumped at both study localities, the density of geophytes was lower and the distance between geophytes or geophyte clumps concomitantly greater at the arid relative to the mesic site. Differences in resource dispersion in turn influenced the patterns of foraging. In response to the low geophyte density and associated longer foraging distances, burrow systems were notably longer and more linear at the arid site. Furthermore, food storage and in situ harvesting were essential components of cooperative foraging in C. h. hottentotus as they minimised the risks of starvation, particularly in arid habitats. Thus, resource characteristics together with the climatic restrictions on burrowing in arid areas may have a marked impact on foraging behaviour, imposing severe constraints on the mole-rats occurring there and ultimately shaping their foraging responses. Together, these factors satisfactorily account for the underlying premise of the AFDH, that arid and mesic habitats exhibit ecological differences with regard to the pattern of resource dispersion and the energetic costs of foraging, which are likely to influence foraging risks and the costs of dispersal. In evaluating the AFDH, the second question which needed to be addressed was whether the study populations exhibited divergence in their social behaviour. The populations revealed no differences in absolute group size or in reproductive characteristics which were related to the effects of aridity per se. However, distinct inter-population divergence was readily apparent in phenotypically plastic traits such as dispersal behaviour and xenophobia. Clear differences were evident between the arid and mesic sites in both the quantitative and qualitative nature of dispersal; dispersal was markedly constrained at the arid site and colonies demonstrated greater temporal stability, with more predictable temporal group membership. The ecological constraints on successful foraging at the arid site will curb opportunities for dispersal and promote cooperation in the C. h. hottentotus occurring there. Colony members should therefore maximise their inclusive fitness by natal philopatry, delayed dispersal and cooperative foraging. Inter-site differences were also apparent in the response of colony members to foreign conspecifics. Common mole-rats from the arid site were markedly more xenophobic than those from the mesic site, and aggressively rejected foreigners. For arid-occurring populations, the fitness penalties for failing to exclude foreigners from the colony burrow system and associated resources, will be more severe than for mesic-occurring populations, resulting in heightened levels of xenophobia. Again, colony cohesion and cooperation in arid areas are essential to individual survival and inclusive fitness. The regional differences in dispersal patterns and xenophobia revealed in this investigation may reflect adaptive variation in social behaviour between the study populations, and the results suggest that delayed dispersal and cooperation may be more crucial to individual survival in arid than in mesic areas. As such these findings provide support for the underlying contention of the AFDH that ecological constraints on foraging in arid areas have promoted a greater degree of social elaboration in mole-rats occurring there. This study provides persuasive support for the AFDH as an explanation for the adaptive significance of social behaviour and cooperation in the common mole-rat, and together with other investigations, suggests that the AFDH provides a valid explanation for the evolution of group-living in the Bathyergidae. DA - 1998 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 1998 T1 - Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity TI - Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23681 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/23681
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationSpinks AC. Sociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridity. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences, 1998 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23681en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Biological Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherZoologyen_ZA
dc.titleSociality in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus : the effects of aridityen_ZA
dc.typeDoctoral Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_ZA
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_sci_Spinks_1985.pdf
Size:
30.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections