The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorArmitage, Neil Pen_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorWinter, Kevinen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Benjaminen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-25T13:20:18Z
dc.date.available2017-01-25T13:20:18Z
dc.date.issued2016en_ZA
dc.description.abstractSustainable Drainage System (SuDS) technologies set out to mitigate the adverse effects of urban stormwater runoff, through a multi-objective approach. Permeable pavement systems (PPSs) are one of the most widely-adopted SuDS technologies in South Africa. South Africa is a water scarce country and the sustainable provision of water to its citizens is one of the most significant challenges facing the country. The demand on the potable water supply system could potentially be alleviated by substituting stormwater for potable water in a 'fit for purpose' manner. A Water Research Commission (WRC) pilot study is attempting to provide locally-relevant data on the treatment efficacy of PPS for possible use in stormwater collection, treatment and storage. A laboratory experiment comprising four separate units was set up to determine the capability of various different PPS designs to reduce selected pollutants from stormwater for South African conditions. Permeable concrete block pavers of the type commonly used in the City of Cape Town (CoCT) area were laid over four different layer-work options, one in each unit, using aggregate largely collected from stockpiles used to construct a nearby PPS in a parking area at the University of Cape Town. In the first phase of the experiment - the 'flushing phase' - clean tap water was applied to each unit over a period of time in quantities roughly representative of a typical rainy season in the CoCT and the discharge was collected and analysed. The measured parameters included: orthophosphate, ammonia, suspended solids, pH and conductivity. After the initial approach proved insufficient for flushing purposes, an accelerated flushing process was then implemented to prepare, as far as reasonably possible, the unwashed in-situ aggregate for the next phase of testing. The second phase examined the pollutant retention capacity of each PPS by comparing the concentrations of various pollutants before and after treatment. However, due to the unforeseen delayed release of the pollutants from the aggregate, the attempted flushing of the insitu stone again proved insufficient for flushing purposes. The pollutants continued leaching into the effluent showing an excess of the flushing volumes applied and thus the treatment efficacy results after the accelerated flushing were contaminated. Nonetheless, these findings provide useful insights for stormwater practitioners and indicated that failure to adhere to accepted international practice with respect to the washing of the aggregate prior to construction and the prevention of the ingress of dirt into the pavement layers during construction, have an adverse impact on the treatment performance of PPS. Therefore, the selection of base materials, in particular, the use of unwashed aggregate and the variation of the treatment layers and the layer material, affect the treatment performance of the permeable paving system and can pollute storm runoff passing through the PPS substantially for an extended period of time. Further research is needed to: determine suitable flushing methods when PPS are constructed with unwashed aggregate; and conduct additional laboratory testing using pre-washed stone to assess treatment efficacy of design variations. Thereafter, suitable fit-for-purpose applications for the treated effluent can be recommended. Keywords: Permeable pavement, stormwater harvesting, Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS), treatment efficacy, pollutant retention, fit for purpose, South Africa, unwashed aggregate.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationBiggs, B. (2016). <i>The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Engineering & the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23016en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationBiggs, Benjamin. <i>"The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Engineering & the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23016en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBiggs, B. 2016. The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements. University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Biggs, Benjamin AB - Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS) technologies set out to mitigate the adverse effects of urban stormwater runoff, through a multi-objective approach. Permeable pavement systems (PPSs) are one of the most widely-adopted SuDS technologies in South Africa. South Africa is a water scarce country and the sustainable provision of water to its citizens is one of the most significant challenges facing the country. The demand on the potable water supply system could potentially be alleviated by substituting stormwater for potable water in a 'fit for purpose' manner. A Water Research Commission (WRC) pilot study is attempting to provide locally-relevant data on the treatment efficacy of PPS for possible use in stormwater collection, treatment and storage. A laboratory experiment comprising four separate units was set up to determine the capability of various different PPS designs to reduce selected pollutants from stormwater for South African conditions. Permeable concrete block pavers of the type commonly used in the City of Cape Town (CoCT) area were laid over four different layer-work options, one in each unit, using aggregate largely collected from stockpiles used to construct a nearby PPS in a parking area at the University of Cape Town. In the first phase of the experiment - the 'flushing phase' - clean tap water was applied to each unit over a period of time in quantities roughly representative of a typical rainy season in the CoCT and the discharge was collected and analysed. The measured parameters included: orthophosphate, ammonia, suspended solids, pH and conductivity. After the initial approach proved insufficient for flushing purposes, an accelerated flushing process was then implemented to prepare, as far as reasonably possible, the unwashed in-situ aggregate for the next phase of testing. The second phase examined the pollutant retention capacity of each PPS by comparing the concentrations of various pollutants before and after treatment. However, due to the unforeseen delayed release of the pollutants from the aggregate, the attempted flushing of the insitu stone again proved insufficient for flushing purposes. The pollutants continued leaching into the effluent showing an excess of the flushing volumes applied and thus the treatment efficacy results after the accelerated flushing were contaminated. Nonetheless, these findings provide useful insights for stormwater practitioners and indicated that failure to adhere to accepted international practice with respect to the washing of the aggregate prior to construction and the prevention of the ingress of dirt into the pavement layers during construction, have an adverse impact on the treatment performance of PPS. Therefore, the selection of base materials, in particular, the use of unwashed aggregate and the variation of the treatment layers and the layer material, affect the treatment performance of the permeable paving system and can pollute storm runoff passing through the PPS substantially for an extended period of time. Further research is needed to: determine suitable flushing methods when PPS are constructed with unwashed aggregate; and conduct additional laboratory testing using pre-washed stone to assess treatment efficacy of design variations. Thereafter, suitable fit-for-purpose applications for the treated effluent can be recommended. Keywords: Permeable pavement, stormwater harvesting, Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS), treatment efficacy, pollutant retention, fit for purpose, South Africa, unwashed aggregate. DA - 2016 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2016 T1 - The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements TI - The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23016 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/23016
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationBiggs B. The impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavements. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Engineering & the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering, 2016 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23016en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherCivil Engineeringen_ZA
dc.titleThe impact of unwashed aggregate on water quality emanating from permeable pavementsen_ZA
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationnameMSc (Eng)en_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_ebe_2016_biggs_benjamin (1).pdf
Size:
3.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Masters