Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development

dc.contributor.advisorFoster, Don
dc.contributor.authorDe Villiers, Abraham Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T18:58:50Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T18:58:50Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.date.updated2023-09-07T18:58:37Z
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to investigate the practical application of Vygotsky's construct of the Zone of Proximal Development to the selection of disadvantaged students in higher education. There is a need in post-apartheid South Africa, with its legacy of inequality in educational experiences, to find accurate and fair predictors of academic performance that would act as alternatives to matriculation marks and static tests. The study relates the students' response to mediation to their academic performance and analyses the role that non-cognitive factors such as motivation, approaches to learning and learning strategies play in cognitive performance. The investigation was done in the form of different studies using over 400 first year students at the Peninsula Technikon as subjects. The first study focused on the effectiveness of the mediated lessons that form part of the two dynamic tests using a Solomon Four Group and a Two Group design. The second study made a comparison between the predictive validity of past academic achievement conventional static tests, several non-cognitive variables as well as the two dynamic tests. In the third study the students' response to a period of mediation was analysed. The fourth study focused on comparing different groups of students according to the following classification: schooling, gender, language, type of course and assessment and level of course to see whether any of the variables would have a moderator effect Finally a differention was made between the profiles of more successful as opposed to less successful students. The weight of evidence of the study indicates that it is possible to find alternatives to matriculation marks and static tests in selecting disadvantaged students by making use of the concept of the Zone of Proximal Development The results further showed that disadvantaged students are not a homogeneous group. Although the matriculation marks seemed to be the best single predictor of academic performance for the total group of students, alternative predictors were identified when looking at different subgroups. Modifiability (students' response to mediation) had a moderator effect on the predictive power of various variables. For the less modifiable group of students, the matriculation marks and, to a certain extent, static tests were good predictors, while for the more modifiable group of students a dynamic test proved to be a significant predictor of academic performance. The implications of the findings for the selection and academic development of disadvantaged students are discussed.
dc.identifier.apacitationDe Villiers, A. B. (1999). <i>Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development</i>. (). ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationDe Villiers, Abraham Benjamin. <i>"Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development."</i> ., ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Psychology, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDe Villiers, A.B. 1999. Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development. . ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Psychology. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Doctoral Thesis AU - De Villiers, Abraham Benjamin AB - The aim of the study is to investigate the practical application of Vygotsky's construct of the Zone of Proximal Development to the selection of disadvantaged students in higher education. There is a need in post-apartheid South Africa, with its legacy of inequality in educational experiences, to find accurate and fair predictors of academic performance that would act as alternatives to matriculation marks and static tests. The study relates the students' response to mediation to their academic performance and analyses the role that non-cognitive factors such as motivation, approaches to learning and learning strategies play in cognitive performance. The investigation was done in the form of different studies using over 400 first year students at the Peninsula Technikon as subjects. The first study focused on the effectiveness of the mediated lessons that form part of the two dynamic tests using a Solomon Four Group and a Two Group design. The second study made a comparison between the predictive validity of past academic achievement conventional static tests, several non-cognitive variables as well as the two dynamic tests. In the third study the students' response to a period of mediation was analysed. The fourth study focused on comparing different groups of students according to the following classification: schooling, gender, language, type of course and assessment and level of course to see whether any of the variables would have a moderator effect Finally a differention was made between the profiles of more successful as opposed to less successful students. The weight of evidence of the study indicates that it is possible to find alternatives to matriculation marks and static tests in selecting disadvantaged students by making use of the concept of the Zone of Proximal Development The results further showed that disadvantaged students are not a homogeneous group. Although the matriculation marks seemed to be the best single predictor of academic performance for the total group of students, alternative predictors were identified when looking at different subgroups. Modifiability (students' response to mediation) had a moderator effect on the predictive power of various variables. For the less modifiable group of students, the matriculation marks and, to a certain extent, static tests were good predictors, while for the more modifiable group of students a dynamic test proved to be a significant predictor of academic performance. The implications of the findings for the selection and academic development of disadvantaged students are discussed. DA - 1999 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Clinical Psychology LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 1999 T1 - Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development TI - Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationDe Villiers AB. Disadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development. []. ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Psychology, 1999 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38453en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Humanities
dc.subjectClinical Psychology
dc.titleDisadvantaged students' academic performance: analysing the zone of proximal development
dc.typeDoctoral Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationlevelPhD
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_hum_1999_de villiers abraham benjamin.pdf
Size:
19.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections