The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cheadle, Halton | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Schwikkard, Pamela Jane | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brink, Raphael Grant | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-30T09:14:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-30T09:14:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-08-15T08:24:55Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, I argue that the present jurisprudence, particularly constitutional law and the common law of South Africa all lend support to the case for decriminalising physician assisted suicide through invoking a right to die with dignity (RDD). This argument is foundationally premised on the clear jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court which sets out the right to dignity and the value of dignity as the touchstone of the South African Constitution. The historical origin and development of the idea of dignity are traversed as well as how this idea found its way to the heart of our constitutional jurisprudence. The study then expounds on the similarities between the South African Constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by comparing each of their Limitations Clauses proceeds to demonstrate how our Constitutional Court may follow analogous principles and reasoning to decriminalise physician assisted suicide by taking a similar approach to that taken in the Supreme Court of Canada. The argument is developed to posit that the South African Constitution with its emphasis on dignity allows for an even more compelling rationale for the decriminalisation of assisted suicide than was available to the Supreme Court of Canada. This thesis also analyses in some detail the present position of assisted suicide at common law and argues that when properly understood, though the legal position is confusing and contradictory, the common law is not in conflict with the potential decriminalisation of physician assisted suicide. Having clarified the present legal position and avenues for the development of the law, the main ethical arguments which inform and underlie the good morals which in turn underlies public policy, the so-called boni mores are considered. The point is made that the boni mores underlies our common law, and when this changes over time, our common law should follow suit. Having concluded that a key element of a decriminalised regime must include sufficient safeguards to protect the weak and vulnerable in our society, an analysis of the law in jurisdictions that have decriminalised physician assisted suicide and/or physician assisted euthanasia is undertaken which in turn culminates in a draft of proposed legislation for South Africa. The thesis points to studies which suggest that the experience in jurisdictions that have enacted a permissive physician assisted suicide regime has been largely positive. People in those jurisdictions who have explicitly chosen to exercise the right to die with dignity have avoided finding themselves in the inhumane condition of being compelled against their will to suffer interminably and unnecessarily. Whilst permissive legislation where available has succeeded in the aforesaid, such legislation does not appear to have resulted in a drop in the overall protection of human rights and the exposure of the vulnerable to harm, as was argued would be the case by those who have historically opposed physician assisted dying legislation. These facts which have become available from early-adopting jurisdictions for several decades now, and from ever more jurisdictions as physician assisted dying legislation is being ever widely passed, now show that the greatest fears of opposers have not come to pass. The study concludes that taking all of the above findings into consideration there appears to be a favourable legal framework and a preponderance of evidence to support a right to die with dignity in South Africa. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Brink, R. G. (2022). <i>The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order</i>. (). ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Brink, Raphael Grant. <i>"The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order."</i> ., ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Brink, R.G. 2022. The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order. . ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Doctoral Thesis AU - Brink, Raphael Grant AB - In this thesis, I argue that the present jurisprudence, particularly constitutional law and the common law of South Africa all lend support to the case for decriminalising physician assisted suicide through invoking a right to die with dignity (RDD). This argument is foundationally premised on the clear jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court which sets out the right to dignity and the value of dignity as the touchstone of the South African Constitution. The historical origin and development of the idea of dignity are traversed as well as how this idea found its way to the heart of our constitutional jurisprudence. The study then expounds on the similarities between the South African Constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by comparing each of their Limitations Clauses proceeds to demonstrate how our Constitutional Court may follow analogous principles and reasoning to decriminalise physician assisted suicide by taking a similar approach to that taken in the Supreme Court of Canada. The argument is developed to posit that the South African Constitution with its emphasis on dignity allows for an even more compelling rationale for the decriminalisation of assisted suicide than was available to the Supreme Court of Canada. This thesis also analyses in some detail the present position of assisted suicide at common law and argues that when properly understood, though the legal position is confusing and contradictory, the common law is not in conflict with the potential decriminalisation of physician assisted suicide. Having clarified the present legal position and avenues for the development of the law, the main ethical arguments which inform and underlie the good morals which in turn underlies public policy, the so-called boni mores are considered. The point is made that the boni mores underlies our common law, and when this changes over time, our common law should follow suit. Having concluded that a key element of a decriminalised regime must include sufficient safeguards to protect the weak and vulnerable in our society, an analysis of the law in jurisdictions that have decriminalised physician assisted suicide and/or physician assisted euthanasia is undertaken which in turn culminates in a draft of proposed legislation for South Africa. The thesis points to studies which suggest that the experience in jurisdictions that have enacted a permissive physician assisted suicide regime has been largely positive. People in those jurisdictions who have explicitly chosen to exercise the right to die with dignity have avoided finding themselves in the inhumane condition of being compelled against their will to suffer interminably and unnecessarily. Whilst permissive legislation where available has succeeded in the aforesaid, such legislation does not appear to have resulted in a drop in the overall protection of human rights and the exposure of the vulnerable to harm, as was argued would be the case by those who have historically opposed physician assisted dying legislation. These facts which have become available from early-adopting jurisdictions for several decades now, and from ever more jurisdictions as physician assisted dying legislation is being ever widely passed, now show that the greatest fears of opposers have not come to pass. The study concludes that taking all of the above findings into consideration there appears to be a favourable legal framework and a preponderance of evidence to support a right to die with dignity in South Africa. DA - 2022_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - public law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2022 T1 - The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order TI - The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Brink RG. The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order. []. ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 2022 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36767 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Public Law | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Law | |
| dc.subject | public law | |
| dc.title | The case for assisted dying/euthanasia in specific cases in South Africa with reference to the development of the South African and Canadian Jurisprudence under a human rights political order | |
| dc.type | Doctoral Thesis | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | PhD |