A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
dc.contributor.advisor | Thompson, Clive | |
dc.contributor.author | Marinus, Grant Brett | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-14T09:53:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-14T09:53:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.date.updated | 2021-11-26T08:27:57Z | |
dc.description.abstract | The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice. | |
dc.identifier.apacitation | Marinus, G. B. (1996). <i>A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995</i>. (). ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Development and Labour Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Marinus, Grant Brett. <i>"A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995."</i> ., ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Development and Labour Law, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Marinus, G.B. 1996. A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. . ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Development and Labour Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris | TY - Master Thesis AU - Marinus, Grant Brett AB - The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice. DA - 1996_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Collective bargaining LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 1996 T1 - A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 TI - A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 ER - | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 | |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Marinus GB. A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. []. ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Development and Labour Law, 1996 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 | en_ZA |
dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
dc.publisher.department | Institute of Development and Labour Law | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Law | |
dc.subject | Collective bargaining | |
dc.title | A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 | |
dc.type | Master Thesis | |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | LLM |