Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorLutchman, Salona
dc.contributor.authorBakilana, Joanna Rahmatoulay
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T09:27:39Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T09:27:39Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.updated2026-07-07T09:26:17Z
dc.description.abstractPost-Second World War, state-centric frameworks sought to establish global human rights norms. Despite this, significant accountability gaps remain, especially in regions where state capacity and will are limited. This minor dissertation explores the relationship between law and civil society in addressing impunity for international crimes, focusing on Tanzania and South Africa. The research examines how international, regional, and domestic legal frameworks in both countries enable or disable civil society organisations (CSOs) in their efforts to bridge those gaps and strengthen accountability mechanisms. Tanzania's limited domestication of international legal frameworks creates a disabling rather than enabling environment for CSOs. In contrast, South Africa's more integrated legal environment theoretically supports CSOs through various measures. The dissertation critically analyses how these contexts influence CSO operations, highlighting the challenges posed by state interferences that manifest in punitive compliance measures. It underscores the pivotal role of CSOs in utilising the law to ensure that states adhere to their legal obligations particularly through grassroots advocacy, public awareness campaigns, and strategic legal action. Furthermore, this desktop study analyses secondary sources such as legal documents, academic literature, and reports from both domestic and international CSOs. Key areas of focus include the influence of international and regional human rights treaties, the integration of these instruments into national frameworks, and how the level of domestication of said instruments affects the effectiveness of CSOs in combating impunity within their respective legal contexts. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how an enabling legal environment can allow CSOs to provide critical oversight of government actions or inactions concerning accountability for human rights violations. This work not only advances discussions on civil society's role in addressing issues within international criminal justice but also offers practical recommendations for enhancing their impact in Tanzania, South Africa, and similar contexts.
dc.identifier.apacitationBakilana, J. R. (2026). <i>Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationBakilana, Joanna Rahmatoulay. <i>"Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 2026. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBakilana, J.R. 2026. Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Bakilana, Joanna Rahmatoulay AB - Post-Second World War, state-centric frameworks sought to establish global human rights norms. Despite this, significant accountability gaps remain, especially in regions where state capacity and will are limited. This minor dissertation explores the relationship between law and civil society in addressing impunity for international crimes, focusing on Tanzania and South Africa. The research examines how international, regional, and domestic legal frameworks in both countries enable or disable civil society organisations (CSOs) in their efforts to bridge those gaps and strengthen accountability mechanisms. Tanzania's limited domestication of international legal frameworks creates a disabling rather than enabling environment for CSOs. In contrast, South Africa's more integrated legal environment theoretically supports CSOs through various measures. The dissertation critically analyses how these contexts influence CSO operations, highlighting the challenges posed by state interferences that manifest in punitive compliance measures. It underscores the pivotal role of CSOs in utilising the law to ensure that states adhere to their legal obligations particularly through grassroots advocacy, public awareness campaigns, and strategic legal action. Furthermore, this desktop study analyses secondary sources such as legal documents, academic literature, and reports from both domestic and international CSOs. Key areas of focus include the influence of international and regional human rights treaties, the integration of these instruments into national frameworks, and how the level of domestication of said instruments affects the effectiveness of CSOs in combating impunity within their respective legal contexts. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how an enabling legal environment can allow CSOs to provide critical oversight of government actions or inactions concerning accountability for human rights violations. This work not only advances discussions on civil society's role in addressing issues within international criminal justice but also offers practical recommendations for enhancing their impact in Tanzania, South Africa, and similar contexts. DA - 2026 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - civil society KW - international criminal law KW - Rome Statute KW - impunity KW - accountability KW - civic space LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2026 T1 - Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa TI - Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationBakilana JR. Civil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 2026 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43475en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Public Law
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Law
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subjectcivil society
dc.subjectinternational criminal law
dc.subjectRome Statute
dc.subjectimpunity
dc.subjectaccountability
dc.subjectcivic space
dc.titleCivil society engagement in the fight against impunity for international crimes: a comparative analysis between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Republic of South Africa
dc.typeThesis / Dissertation
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelLLM
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_law_2026_bakilana joanna rahmatoulay.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Masters