The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms

dc.contributor.advisorJacklin, Heather
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T18:54:04Z
dc.date.available2020-09-28T18:54:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2020-09-28T16:30:14Z
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to understand the role of school timetables as an interface between policies that regulate or distribute forms of capital to schools, and their teaching and learning rhythms. By doing so, it proposes a mechanism for examining the reproduction of schooling practices, and how these are grounded in policy-regulated materiality. Two high schools with similar historic backgrounds, and operating under the same provincial government, were selected and closely studied for evidence of rhythms of practice and the correspondence of these rhythms to each school's timetable. The two schools now experience different access to resources, and have significant differences in teaching and learning rhythms, as well as school-leaving summative assessment results. The study develops an analytic framework for identifying policies that reach into schools through the timetable. Five key inputs are identified as necessary for constructing timetables, providing productive lines of inquiry as to which policies affect schooling rhythms and how. By asking who teaches whom, what, with what and where, systematic analysis is conducted on: how schools are staffed (who); who they enrol (whom); their interpretation of curriculum (what); what supplementary resources they can command (with what); and their infrastructural facilities and geographic (dis)advantages (where). The interaction between these different threads is examined as they tangle within each school's timetable. The enactment of the policies regulating each thread is then traced through the layers of governance of the South African education system: national, provincial and local (school-level). Timetables are conceptualised in this study as local representations of intended teaching and learning rhythm. Using Lefebvre's triad of timespace-conceived, timespace-perceived and timespace-lived, timetables (timespace-conceived) are brought into conversation with timespace-lived through daily teaching and learning activities. Bourdieu's theory of practice is used with Lefebvre to animate the ‘game' of schooling: what schools strive for, what forms of capital they can command to sustain or improve their field position, and how they reproduce their practices. Bourdieu and Lefebvre together generate a sociomaterial practice theory lens that foregrounds timetables and their legitimacy to govern rhythms of teaching and learning in timespace. Timetables emerge as a site of the production and reproduction of advantage (fortified schools) and/or disadvantage (exposed schools) in the game of schooling. In timetables, the policies that avail forms of capital interact in previously unconsidered ways, suggesting that collectively they potentially undergird inequality in the education system.
dc.identifier.apacitationMuller, S. (2020). <i>The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms</i>. (). ,Faculty of Humanities ,School of Education. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationMuller, Sara. <i>"The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms."</i> ., ,Faculty of Humanities ,School of Education, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMuller, S. 2020. The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms. . ,Faculty of Humanities ,School of Education. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Doctoral Thesis AU - Muller, Sara AB - This thesis seeks to understand the role of school timetables as an interface between policies that regulate or distribute forms of capital to schools, and their teaching and learning rhythms. By doing so, it proposes a mechanism for examining the reproduction of schooling practices, and how these are grounded in policy-regulated materiality. Two high schools with similar historic backgrounds, and operating under the same provincial government, were selected and closely studied for evidence of rhythms of practice and the correspondence of these rhythms to each school's timetable. The two schools now experience different access to resources, and have significant differences in teaching and learning rhythms, as well as school-leaving summative assessment results. The study develops an analytic framework for identifying policies that reach into schools through the timetable. Five key inputs are identified as necessary for constructing timetables, providing productive lines of inquiry as to which policies affect schooling rhythms and how. By asking who teaches whom, what, with what and where, systematic analysis is conducted on: how schools are staffed (who); who they enrol (whom); their interpretation of curriculum (what); what supplementary resources they can command (with what); and their infrastructural facilities and geographic (dis)advantages (where). The interaction between these different threads is examined as they tangle within each school's timetable. The enactment of the policies regulating each thread is then traced through the layers of governance of the South African education system: national, provincial and local (school-level). Timetables are conceptualised in this study as local representations of intended teaching and learning rhythm. Using Lefebvre's triad of timespace-conceived, timespace-perceived and timespace-lived, timetables (timespace-conceived) are brought into conversation with timespace-lived through daily teaching and learning activities. Bourdieu's theory of practice is used with Lefebvre to animate the ‘game' of schooling: what schools strive for, what forms of capital they can command to sustain or improve their field position, and how they reproduce their practices. Bourdieu and Lefebvre together generate a sociomaterial practice theory lens that foregrounds timetables and their legitimacy to govern rhythms of teaching and learning in timespace. Timetables emerge as a site of the production and reproduction of advantage (fortified schools) and/or disadvantage (exposed schools) in the game of schooling. In timetables, the policies that avail forms of capital interact in previously unconsidered ways, suggesting that collectively they potentially undergird inequality in the education system. DA - 2020_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Timetable KW - rhythm KW - school timespace KW - education policies KW - forms of capital KW - timespace-conceived KW - timespace-lived KW - fortified and exposed KW - reproduction LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2020 T1 - The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms TI - The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationMuller S. The tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms. []. ,Faculty of Humanities ,School of Education, 2020 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32292en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Education
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Humanities
dc.subjectTimetable
dc.subjectrhythm
dc.subjectschool timespace
dc.subjecteducation policies
dc.subjectforms of capital
dc.subjecttimespace-conceived
dc.subjecttimespace-lived
dc.subjectfortified and exposed
dc.subjectreproduction
dc.titleThe tyranny of timespace: examining the timetable of schooling activities as the interface between policy and everyday rhythms
dc.typeDoctoral Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationlevelPhD
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_hum_2020_muller sara.pdf
Size:
11.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections