Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education

dc.contributor.advisorSpiegel, Andrew
dc.contributor.advisorMorreira, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorFore, Grant A
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T09:30:43Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T09:30:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2023-02-20T12:45:21Z
dc.description.abstractThis thesis comprises an ethnography of design education on which a proposed intervention into the theory and praxis of ethics education is created. It is based on an investigation – conducted in conversation with undergraduate interior design/architectural technology students – into the hegemonic structures of higher education and the singularities that may have the potential to transform them. The ethnographic work involved interrogating students' design processes and ethical sense-making across three semesters of a community-engaged course at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. The course was designed to mirror the operations of an architectural firm, and community partners acted as “clients.” As students designed floor plans, they were affected by multiple actants and forces. The design actants and affective forces constituting student designs are identified to reveal the relations of design. These relations were often concealed and devalued through the hegemonic design logic of capitalist modernity that manifested in ideas such as the “American Dream” and discourses of professionalism which were reproduced through the ideological state apparatus that is the university. While students often made meaning of their experience of design relations through such a hegemonic design logic, such meaning making was not absolute and alternative meanings arose, expressing ethico-aesthetic modes of valuation. When students' meaning making was captured by capital, influential relations were concealed and devalued, creating hauntings within designs. Notions of commodity fetishism and dead labor are utilized to further theorize the concept of ethical fetishism and, in doing so, to imagine new ways both to reveal design's ghostly relations and then to value them for the creative role each plays in constituting the present. By seeking to understand how extensively student design processes are or are not captured by an otherwise totalizing system of capitalism and the beliefs, assumptions, and values of modernity, the thesis identifies moments of slippage where singularities flee the articulating forces of capitalist modernity and the discourses and ideologies born from it. The thesis ends with suggestions towards a new potentiality for ethics education (i.e., ethical becoming) that recognizes and cherishes relationality whilst challenging the beliefs and values of capitalist modernity designing us every day.
dc.identifier.apacitationFore, G. A. (2022). <i>Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education</i>. (). ,Faculty of Humanities ,Social Anthropology. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationFore, Grant A. <i>"Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education."</i> ., ,Faculty of Humanities ,Social Anthropology, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationFore, G.A. 2022. Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education. . ,Faculty of Humanities ,Social Anthropology. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Doctoral Thesis AU - Fore, Grant A AB - This thesis comprises an ethnography of design education on which a proposed intervention into the theory and praxis of ethics education is created. It is based on an investigation – conducted in conversation with undergraduate interior design/architectural technology students – into the hegemonic structures of higher education and the singularities that may have the potential to transform them. The ethnographic work involved interrogating students' design processes and ethical sense-making across three semesters of a community-engaged course at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. The course was designed to mirror the operations of an architectural firm, and community partners acted as “clients.” As students designed floor plans, they were affected by multiple actants and forces. The design actants and affective forces constituting student designs are identified to reveal the relations of design. These relations were often concealed and devalued through the hegemonic design logic of capitalist modernity that manifested in ideas such as the “American Dream” and discourses of professionalism which were reproduced through the ideological state apparatus that is the university. While students often made meaning of their experience of design relations through such a hegemonic design logic, such meaning making was not absolute and alternative meanings arose, expressing ethico-aesthetic modes of valuation. When students' meaning making was captured by capital, influential relations were concealed and devalued, creating hauntings within designs. Notions of commodity fetishism and dead labor are utilized to further theorize the concept of ethical fetishism and, in doing so, to imagine new ways both to reveal design's ghostly relations and then to value them for the creative role each plays in constituting the present. By seeking to understand how extensively student design processes are or are not captured by an otherwise totalizing system of capitalism and the beliefs, assumptions, and values of modernity, the thesis identifies moments of slippage where singularities flee the articulating forces of capitalist modernity and the discourses and ideologies born from it. The thesis ends with suggestions towards a new potentiality for ethics education (i.e., ethical becoming) that recognizes and cherishes relationality whilst challenging the beliefs and values of capitalist modernity designing us every day. DA - 2022_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Anthropology LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2022 T1 - Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education TI - Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationFore GA. Ethical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education. []. ,Faculty of Humanities ,Social Anthropology, 2022 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37263en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentSocial Anthropology
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Humanities
dc.subjectAnthropology
dc.titleEthical Becoming, Ethical Fetishism, and Capitalist Modernity: An Ethnography of Design Education
dc.typeDoctoral Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationlevelPhD
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_hum_2022_fore grant a.pdf
Size:
17.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections