Browsing by Subject "quality"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    Assessing the implementation challenges in construction projects: a case study of the Department of Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure, Limpopo province.
    (2026) Lucia, Ramakwe-Makgaleng Manee; Windapo, Abimbola
    This study investigates the implementation challenges that affect the successful completion of construction projects at the Department of Public Works, Roads, and Infrastructure (DPWRI) in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Despite the significance of these projects, there has been limited research on specific challenges faced within Limpopo Province, particularly regarding time, cost, quality, and overall satisfaction. Utilising a quantitative research approach, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with construction professionals directly involved in project execution at DPWRI. Selfadministered questionnaires were distributed, and responses were analysed using mean item score and Chi-square analysis. The findings reveal that five primary challenges as lack of experience, financial problems, insufficient use of sustainable materials and technology, poor cash flow, and inadequate site management—ranked highest in affecting construction performance. These challenges significantly impact project outcomes but can be mitigated through the adoption of modern construction methods, timely payments from clients, strict adherence to budgets, the availability of qualified personnel, and the enforcement of relevant policies and procedures. The study concludes with recommendations for appointing contractors based on their expertise and experience in similar projects, as well as advice for contractors to engage qualified professionals and ensure prompt payment upon invoicing.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Editorial: How is Quality Addressed Within Practice-Based Learning?
    (2018-12) Buchanan, Helen
    In 2011, the World Health Organization (2011) proposed a three-pillar radical plan of educational reforms addressing the quality, quantity, and relevance of health professionals to address global health challenges and improve health outcomes. Seven years on, it seems pertinent to consider how educators are addressing the three pillars outlined in this bold plan in the context of practice-based learning. The increasing pressure on higher educational institutions to produce graduates who are adequately equipped for the workforce (Cooper, Orrell, and Bowden 2010) validates the critical contribution of practice-based learning in preparing health professionals for the future. Practice-based learning provides an ideal forum for educating health professionals who are not only “technically competent and efficient” but are also “able to work in teams, to adapt to a changing practice environment and to initiate change where needed” (World Health Organization 2011: 7). But, how is quality addressed within practice-based learning?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2011) Reynolds, Joanna; Kizito, James; Ezumah, Nkoli; Mangesho, Peter; Allen, Elizabeth; Chandler, Clare
    BACKGROUND:Increasing demand for qualitative research within global health has emerged alongside increasing demand for demonstration of quality of research, in line with the evidence-based model of medicine. In quantitative health sciences research, in particular clinical trials, there exist clear and widely-recognised guidelines for conducting quality assurance of research. However, no comparable guidelines exist for qualitative research and although there are long-standing debates on what constitutes 'quality' in qualitative research, the concept of 'quality assurance' has not been explored widely. In acknowledgement of this gap, we sought to review discourses around quality assurance of qualitative research, as a first step towards developing guidance. METHODS: A range of databases, journals and grey literature sources were searched, and papers were included if they explicitly addressed quality assurance within a qualitative paradigm. A meta-narrative approach was used to review and synthesise the literature. RESULTS: Among the 37 papers included in the review, two dominant narratives were interpreted from the literature, reflecting contrasting approaches to quality assurance. The first focuses on demonstrating quality within research outputs; the second focuses on principles for quality practice throughout the research process. The second narrative appears to offer an approach to quality assurance that befits the values of qualitative research, emphasising the need to consider quality throughout the research process. CONCLUSIONS: The paper identifies the strengths of the approaches represented in each narrative and recommend these are brought together in the development of a flexible framework to help qualitative researchers to define, apply and demonstrate principles of quality in their research.