Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Jantina
dc.contributor.authorMunung, Syntia Nchangwi
dc.contributor.authorMatimba, Alice
dc.contributor.authorMcCurdy, Sheryl
dc.contributor.authorOuwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Odile
dc.contributor.authorStaunton, Ciara
dc.contributor.authorYakubu, Aminu
dc.contributor.authorTindana, Paulina
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T06:54:41Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T06:54:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The introduction of genomics and biobanking methodologies to the African research context has also introduced novel ways of doing science, based on values of sharing and reuse of data and samples. This shift raises ethical challenges that need to be considered when research is reviewed by ethics committees, relating for instance to broad consent, the feedback of individual genetic findings, and regulation of secondary sample access and use. Yet existing ethics guidelines and regulations in Africa do not successfully regulate research based on sharing, causing confusion about what is allowed, where and when. Methods In order to understand better the ethics regulatory landscape around genomic research and biobanking, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing ethics guidelines, policies and other similar sources. We sourced 30 ethics regulatory documents from 22 African countries. We used software that assists with qualitative data analysis to conduct a thematic analysis of these documents. Results Surprisingly considering how contentious broad consent is in Africa, we found that most countries allow the use of this consent model, with its use banned in only three of the countries we investigated. In a likely response to fears about exploitation, the export of samples outside of the continent is strictly regulated, sometimes in conjunction with regulations around international collaboration. We also found that whilst an essential and critical component of ensuring ethical best practice in genomics research relates to the governance framework that accompanies sample and data sharing, this was most sparingly covered in the guidelines. Conclusions There is a need for ethics guidelines in African countries to be adapted to the changing science policy landscape, which increasingly supports principles of openness, storage, sharing and secondary use. Current guidelines are not pertinent to the ethical challenges that such a new orientation raises, and therefore fail to provide accurate guidance to ethics committees and researchers.
dc.identifier.apacitationde Vries, J., Munung, S. N., Matimba, A., McCurdy, S., Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, O., Staunton, C., ... Tindana, P. (2017). Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. <i>BMC Medical Ethics</i>, 18(1), 174 - 177. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationde Vries, Jantina, Syntia Nchangwi Munung, Alice Matimba, Sheryl McCurdy, Odile Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Ciara Staunton, Aminu Yakubu, and Paulina Tindana "Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries." <i>BMC Medical Ethics</i> 18, 1. (2017): 174 - 177. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationde Vries, J., Munung, S.N., Matimba, A., McCurdy, S., Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, O., Staunton, C., Yakubu, A. & Tindana, P. et al. 2017. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. <i>BMC Medical Ethics.</i> 18(1):174 - 177. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1472-6939
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - de Vries, Jantina AU - Munung, Syntia Nchangwi AU - Matimba, Alice AU - McCurdy, Sheryl AU - Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Odile AU - Staunton, Ciara AU - Yakubu, Aminu AU - Tindana, Paulina AB - Abstract Background The introduction of genomics and biobanking methodologies to the African research context has also introduced novel ways of doing science, based on values of sharing and reuse of data and samples. This shift raises ethical challenges that need to be considered when research is reviewed by ethics committees, relating for instance to broad consent, the feedback of individual genetic findings, and regulation of secondary sample access and use. Yet existing ethics guidelines and regulations in Africa do not successfully regulate research based on sharing, causing confusion about what is allowed, where and when. Methods In order to understand better the ethics regulatory landscape around genomic research and biobanking, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing ethics guidelines, policies and other similar sources. We sourced 30 ethics regulatory documents from 22 African countries. We used software that assists with qualitative data analysis to conduct a thematic analysis of these documents. Results Surprisingly considering how contentious broad consent is in Africa, we found that most countries allow the use of this consent model, with its use banned in only three of the countries we investigated. In a likely response to fears about exploitation, the export of samples outside of the continent is strictly regulated, sometimes in conjunction with regulations around international collaboration. We also found that whilst an essential and critical component of ensuring ethical best practice in genomics research relates to the governance framework that accompanies sample and data sharing, this was most sparingly covered in the guidelines. Conclusions There is a need for ethics guidelines in African countries to be adapted to the changing science policy landscape, which increasingly supports principles of openness, storage, sharing and secondary use. Current guidelines are not pertinent to the ethical challenges that such a new orientation raises, and therefore fail to provide accurate guidance to ethics committees and researchers. DA - 2017 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town IS - 1 J1 - BMC Medical Ethics LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2017 SM - 1472-6939 T1 - Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries TI - Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationde Vries J, Munung SN, Matimba A, McCurdy S, Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O, Staunton C, et al. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. BMC Medical Ethics. 2017;18(1):174 - 177. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/34313.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Medicine
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
dc.sourceBMC Medical Ethics
dc.source.journalissue1
dc.source.journalvolume18
dc.source.pagination174 - 177
dc.source.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6
dc.subject.otherAfrica
dc.subject.otherBiological Specimen Banks
dc.subject.otherBiomedical Research
dc.subject.otherEthics Committees, Research
dc.subject.otherEthics, Research
dc.subject.otherGenomics
dc.subject.otherGuidelines as Topic
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherInformation Dissemination
dc.subject.otherInformed Consent
dc.subject.otherPolicy
dc.subject.otherResearch Personnel
dc.subject.otherResearch Subjects
dc.subject.otherSocial Control, Formal
dc.titleRegulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.publicationResearch
uct.type.resourceJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
deVriesJantina_Regulationgenom_2017.pdf
Size:
422.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles