The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola
| dc.contributor.author | Boyles, Tom H | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-28T06:47:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-12-28T06:47:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_ZA |
| dc.description.abstract | The mortality rate for patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa is approximately 65% [1]. There are no published figures for high-resource settings, but media sources and individual case reports suggest it is much lower and approaches 0% for those who receive this level of care from the beginning of their illness. In their article "Ebola Viral Disease: Experience and Decision Making for the First Cases outside of Africa," David Stephens and colleagues give insight into the care that can be provided when available resources are not the limiting factor [2]. They describe the decision to open the Serious Communicable Diseases Unit (SCDU) of Emory University Hospital (EUH) when two United States patients contracted EVD while working in West Africa. Using a large specialist team, they provided high-quality care in a safe working environment and disseminated their knowledge and experience widely. In particular, they were able to respond to the huge increase in requests from health care facilities in the US for help in excluding the diagnosis of EVD. Caring for patients using an individualised approach under ideal circumstances contrasts with, but can also inform, the public health approach to care under resource-limited conditions in West Africa. The models of care employed in each environment show some similarities and also have a number of key differences. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Boyles, T. H. (2015). The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola. <i>PLOS Medicince</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16053 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Boyles, Tom H "The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola." <i>PLOS Medicince</i> (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16053 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Boyles, T. H. (2015). The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola. PLoS Med, 12(7), e1001858. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001858 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - Boyles, Tom H AB - The mortality rate for patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa is approximately 65% [1]. There are no published figures for high-resource settings, but media sources and individual case reports suggest it is much lower and approaches 0% for those who receive this level of care from the beginning of their illness. In their article "Ebola Viral Disease: Experience and Decision Making for the First Cases outside of Africa," David Stephens and colleagues give insight into the care that can be provided when available resources are not the limiting factor [2]. They describe the decision to open the Serious Communicable Diseases Unit (SCDU) of Emory University Hospital (EUH) when two United States patients contracted EVD while working in West Africa. Using a large specialist team, they provided high-quality care in a safe working environment and disseminated their knowledge and experience widely. In particular, they were able to respond to the huge increase in requests from health care facilities in the US for help in excluding the diagnosis of EVD. Caring for patients using an individualised approach under ideal circumstances contrasts with, but can also inform, the public health approach to care under resource-limited conditions in West Africa. The models of care employed in each environment show some similarities and also have a number of key differences. DA - 2015 DB - OpenUCT DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001858 DP - University of Cape Town J1 - PLOS Medicince LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2015 T1 - The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola TI - The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16053 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16053 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001858 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Boyles TH. The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola. PLOS Medicince. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16053. | en_ZA |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.department | Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2015 Tom H | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_ZA |
| dc.source | PLOS Medicince | en_ZA |
| dc.source.uri | http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Ebola hemorrhagic fever | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Electrolytes | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Health care facilities | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Africa | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Death rates | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Public and occupational health | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Ebola virus | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Nosocomial infections | en_ZA |
| dc.title | The individualised versus the public health approach to treating Ebola | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
| uct.type.filetype | Text | |
| uct.type.filetype | Image | |
| uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
| uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Boyles_The_Individualised_vs_the_Public_Health_2015.pdf
- Size:
- 141.96 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: