The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?

dc.contributor.advisorCorder, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorProudlock, Paula
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-18T09:13:35Z
dc.date.available2026-03-18T09:13:35Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2026-03-16T09:26:17Z
dc.description.abstractSections 5(2), 32(1) and (2), of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 have been interpreted by the Ministers of Social Development (SD) and Finance to delegate authority to them to determine the age limit of children and the income threshold of caregivers who qualify for the Child Support Grant (CSG). The Minister of SD, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, has promulgated two sets of regulations in terms of s32 of the Act. The first set was promulgated in February 20052 ('the 2005 regulations'). The second set, which repealed the first set, was promulgated in August 20083 ('the 2008 regulations'). In regard to the age limit, the 2005 regulations set the age limit at 14 years4 and the 2008 regulations set the age limit at 15 years with effect from 1 January 2009.5 The current age limit is therefore 15 years of age. This means that children qualify until their 15th birthday after which their grant is terminated, and that children who are already 15 years of age or older do not qualify for the CSG.
dc.identifier.apacitationProudlock, P. (2009). <i>The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Centre for Law and Society. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationProudlock, Paula. <i>"The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Centre for Law and Society, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationProudlock, P. 2009. The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Centre for Law and Society. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Proudlock, Paula AB - Sections 5(2), 32(1) and (2), of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 have been interpreted by the Ministers of Social Development (SD) and Finance to delegate authority to them to determine the age limit of children and the income threshold of caregivers who qualify for the Child Support Grant (CSG). The Minister of SD, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, has promulgated two sets of regulations in terms of s32 of the Act. The first set was promulgated in February 20052 ('the 2005 regulations'). The second set, which repealed the first set, was promulgated in August 20083 ('the 2008 regulations'). In regard to the age limit, the 2005 regulations set the age limit at 14 years4 and the 2008 regulations set the age limit at 15 years with effect from 1 January 2009.5 The current age limit is therefore 15 years of age. This means that children qualify until their 15th birthday after which their grant is terminated, and that children who are already 15 years of age or older do not qualify for the CSG. DA - 2009 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Social Assistance Act KW - Child Support Grant KW - Income LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2009 T1 - The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? TI - The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationProudlock P. The Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Centre for Law and Society, 2009 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43001en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentCentre for Law and Society
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Law
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subjectSocial Assistance Act
dc.subjectChild Support Grant
dc.subjectIncome
dc.titleThe Social Assistance Act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional?
dc.typeThesis / Dissertation
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelLLM
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_law_2009_proudlock paula.pdf
Size:
1.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections