Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School

dc.contributor.advisorGoodman, Suki
dc.contributor.authorArendse, Linzee
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-17T10:12:45Z
dc.date.available2022-11-17T10:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-10-27T11:14:56Z
dc.description.abstractManaging workload allocation to ensure fairness and equity amongst staff can be a challenge in any organisation and managing the workload allocation of autonomy seeking academic staff in a business school can be even more so. In this study, the researcher aimed to review a recently designed and implemented academic workload allocation model in a South African business school in order to establish whether the model and implementation system has been successful in contributing to actual and perceived fairness and equity in workload distribution amongst their academic staff. The researcher did this by using a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach, first reviewing documentary evidence, which informed the design of an online survey with the academic staff, followed by semi-structured interviews with a sample group. The study reveals that the model, and the way it was implemented and managed, failed to achieve its intended aims of increased equitable and fair workloads amongst academic staff. These implementation failures have resulted in negative consequences for the organisational culture. Staff satisfaction and engagement with the model, its implementation and management does not present positively in the findings of this study. In the South African context where there are very few studies related to academic workload allocation models, the results of this study may be valuable for higher education institutions considering the introduction or review of workload models amongst their academic staff. The study highlights the importance of an inclusive and careful design approach, change management considerations during the implementation phase, and the transparent management of the workload allocation process and results.
dc.identifier.apacitationArendse, L. (2021). <i>Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School</i>. (). ,Faculty of Commerce ,School of Management Studies. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationArendse, Linzee. <i>"Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School."</i> ., ,Faculty of Commerce ,School of Management Studies, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationArendse, L. 2021. Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School. . ,Faculty of Commerce ,School of Management Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Master Thesis AU - Arendse, Linzee AB - Managing workload allocation to ensure fairness and equity amongst staff can be a challenge in any organisation and managing the workload allocation of autonomy seeking academic staff in a business school can be even more so. In this study, the researcher aimed to review a recently designed and implemented academic workload allocation model in a South African business school in order to establish whether the model and implementation system has been successful in contributing to actual and perceived fairness and equity in workload distribution amongst their academic staff. The researcher did this by using a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach, first reviewing documentary evidence, which informed the design of an online survey with the academic staff, followed by semi-structured interviews with a sample group. The study reveals that the model, and the way it was implemented and managed, failed to achieve its intended aims of increased equitable and fair workloads amongst academic staff. These implementation failures have resulted in negative consequences for the organisational culture. Staff satisfaction and engagement with the model, its implementation and management does not present positively in the findings of this study. In the South African context where there are very few studies related to academic workload allocation models, the results of this study may be valuable for higher education institutions considering the introduction or review of workload models amongst their academic staff. The study highlights the importance of an inclusive and careful design approach, change management considerations during the implementation phase, and the transparent management of the workload allocation process and results. DA - 2021_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Academic workload KW - Academic workload allocation model KW - Equity and Fairness LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2021 T1 - Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School TI - Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationArendse L. Assessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School. []. ,Faculty of Commerce ,School of Management Studies, 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36906en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Management Studies
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Commerce
dc.subjectAcademic workload
dc.subjectAcademic workload allocation model
dc.subjectEquity and Fairness
dc.titleAssessing the effectiveness of the Academic Workload Allocation Model at a South African Business School
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelMPhil
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_com_2021_arendselinzee.pdf
Size:
1.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections