From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorO'Regan, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-06T09:34:43Z
dc.date.available2018-06-06T09:34:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.updated2016-01-20T09:55:56Z
dc.description.abstractAt the Constitutional Court, collegial deliberation is lengthy, substantive and conducted both verbally in meetings and electronically by the exchange of notes and drafts. During the course of deliberation on a particular case, the court will meet at least twice to discuss it and often as many as half a dozen times and sometimes even more. In addition, there will ordinarily be many lengthy written exchanges on the case. The process of deliberation at its best refines issues, improves legal reasoning and renders just outcomes more likely. As a result of the process of deliberation, a draft judgment may change dramatically from when first written to its final form.
dc.identifier.apacitationO'Regan, C. (2008). From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann. <i>Acta Juridica</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28232en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationO'Regan, Catherine "From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann." <i>Acta Juridica</i> (2008) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28232en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationO'Regan, C. (2008). Form form to substance: the constitutional jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann. Acta Juridica: Dignity, freedom and the post-apartheid legal order: the critical jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann, 1-17.
dc.identifier.ris TY - AU - O'Regan, Catherine AB - At the Constitutional Court, collegial deliberation is lengthy, substantive and conducted both verbally in meetings and electronically by the exchange of notes and drafts. During the course of deliberation on a particular case, the court will meet at least twice to discuss it and often as many as half a dozen times and sometimes even more. In addition, there will ordinarily be many lengthy written exchanges on the case. The process of deliberation at its best refines issues, improves legal reasoning and renders just outcomes more likely. As a result of the process of deliberation, a draft judgment may change dramatically from when first written to its final form. DA - 2008 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Acta Juridica LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2008 T1 - From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann TI - From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28232 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/28232
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationO'Regan C. From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann. Acta Juridica. 2008; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28232.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Private Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceActa Juridica
dc.source.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/journal/ju_jur
dc.titleFrom Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
O'Regan_Article_2008.pdf
Size:
82.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles