Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa
| dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Patrick | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Mackay, Alex | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-08T10:54:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-03-08T10:54:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | en_ZA |
| dc.description.abstract | People heat treated silcrete during the Middle Stone Age (MSA) in southern Africa but the spatial and temporal variability of this practice remains poorly documented. This paucity of data in turn makes it difficult to interrogate the motive factors underlying the application of this technique. In this paper we present data on heat treatment of silcrete through the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort of the rock shelter site Mertenhof, located in the Western Cape of South Africa. In contrast to other sites where heat treatment has been documented, distance to rock source at Mertenhof can be reasonably well estimated, and the site is known to contain high proportions of a diversity of fine grained rocks including silcrete, hornfels and chert at various points through the sequence. Our results suggest the prevalence of heat treatment is variable through the sequence but that it is largely unaffected by the relative abundance of silcrete prevalence. Instead there is a strong inverse correlation between frequency of heat treatment in silcrete and prevalence of chert in the assemblage, and a generally positive correlation with the proportion of locally available rock. While it is difficult to separate individual factors we suggest that, at Mertenhof at least, heat treatment may have been used to improve the fracture properties of silcrete at times when other finer grained rocks were less readily available. As such, heat treatment appears to have been a component of the MSA behavioural repertoire that was flexibly deployed in ways sensitive to other elements of technological organisation. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Schmidt, P., & Mackay, A. (2016). Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa. <i>PLoS One</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17573 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Schmidt, Patrick, and Alex Mackay "Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa." <i>PLoS One</i> (2016) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17573 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Schmidt, P., & Mackay, A. (2016). Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa. PloS one, 11(2), e0149243. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149243 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - Schmidt, Patrick AU - Mackay, Alex AB - People heat treated silcrete during the Middle Stone Age (MSA) in southern Africa but the spatial and temporal variability of this practice remains poorly documented. This paucity of data in turn makes it difficult to interrogate the motive factors underlying the application of this technique. In this paper we present data on heat treatment of silcrete through the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort of the rock shelter site Mertenhof, located in the Western Cape of South Africa. In contrast to other sites where heat treatment has been documented, distance to rock source at Mertenhof can be reasonably well estimated, and the site is known to contain high proportions of a diversity of fine grained rocks including silcrete, hornfels and chert at various points through the sequence. Our results suggest the prevalence of heat treatment is variable through the sequence but that it is largely unaffected by the relative abundance of silcrete prevalence. Instead there is a strong inverse correlation between frequency of heat treatment in silcrete and prevalence of chert in the assemblage, and a generally positive correlation with the proportion of locally available rock. While it is difficult to separate individual factors we suggest that, at Mertenhof at least, heat treatment may have been used to improve the fracture properties of silcrete at times when other finer grained rocks were less readily available. As such, heat treatment appears to have been a component of the MSA behavioural repertoire that was flexibly deployed in ways sensitive to other elements of technological organisation. DA - 2016 DB - OpenUCT DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149243 DP - University of Cape Town J1 - PLoS One LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2016 T1 - Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa TI - Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17573 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149243 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17573 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Schmidt P, Mackay A. Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa. PLoS One. 2016; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17573. | en_ZA |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Archaeology | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Science | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2016 Schmidt, Mackay | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_ZA |
| dc.source | PLoS One | en_ZA |
| dc.source.uri | http://journals.plos.org/plosone | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Heat treatment | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Raw materials | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Archaeology | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Paleoanthropology | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Petrology | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Stratigraphy | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Tempering | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Rivers | en_ZA |
| dc.title | Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
| uct.type.filetype | Text | |
| uct.type.filetype | Image | |
| uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
| uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Schmidt_Why_Was_Silcrete_Heat_Treated_2016.pdf
- Size:
- 10.81 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: