Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRoss-Gillespie, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorButterworth, Doug S
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T09:01:21Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T09:01:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.description.abstractA value is sought for the M. capensis combined CPUE and survey index of abundance J which would constitute the threshold below which additional (supra-OMP) management measures would need to be taken (probably in the form of moving the distribution of offshore trawling to deeper waters) to safeguard this resource in circumstances where its abundance had dropped too low. A simple approach suggests that a threshold value of 0.6 would be appropriate to identify and achieve some reasonable response to a recruitment failure, whilst limiting instances of responses to false positives where there was in fact no problemen_US
dc.identifier.apacitationRoss-Gillespie, A., & Butterworth, D. (2018). <i>Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low</i> ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30326en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationRoss-Gillespie, Andrea, and Doug Butterworth <i>Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low.</i> ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30326en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationRoss-Gillespie, A., Butterworth, D. 2018-11. Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Report AU - Ross-Gillespie, Andrea AU - Butterworth, Doug AB - A value is sought for the M. capensis combined CPUE and survey index of abundance J which would constitute the threshold below which additional (supra-OMP) management measures would need to be taken (probably in the form of moving the distribution of offshore trawling to deeper waters) to safeguard this resource in circumstances where its abundance had dropped too low. A simple approach suggests that a threshold value of 0.6 would be appropriate to identify and achieve some reasonable response to a recruitment failure, whilst limiting instances of responses to false positives where there was in fact no problem DA - 2018-11 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2018 T1 - Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low TI - Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30326 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/30326
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationRoss-Gillespie A, Butterworth D. Exploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too low. 2018 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30326en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematicsen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_US
dc.titleExploration of a safe-guard criterion for OMP2018 in the eventuality that the M. capensis CPUE and survey indices of abundance drop too lowen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FISHERIES_2018_OCT_SWG-DEM_74 - OMP 2018 - M capensis low abundance rule_final_final.pdf
Size:
336.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Reports