Adolescents’ Perspectives on the Drivers of Obesity Using a Group Model Building Approach: A South African Perspective
Journal Article
2022-02-14
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
Department
Faculty
Series
Abstract
Overweight and obesity increase the risk of a range of poor physiological and psychosocial health outcomes. Previous work with well-defined cohorts has explored the determinants of obesity and employed various methods and measures; however, less is known on the broader societal drivers, beyond individual-level influences, using a systems framework with adolescents. The aim of this study was to explore the drivers of obesity from adolescents’ perspectives using a systems approach through group model building in four South African schools. Group model building was used to generate 4 causal loop diagrams with 62 adolescents aged 16–18 years. These maps were merged into one final map, and the main themes were identified: (i) physical activity and social media use; (ii) physical activity, health-related morbidity, and socio-economic status; (iii) accessibility of unhealthy food and energy intake/body weight; (iv) psychological distress, body weight, and weight-related bullying; and (v) parental involvement and unhealthy food intake. Our study identified meaningful policy-relevant insights into the drivers of adolescent obesity, as described by the young people themselves in a South African context. This approach, both the process of construction and the final visualization, provides a basis for taking a novel approach to prevention and intervention recommendations for adolescent obesity.
Description
Reference:
Hendricks, G., Savona, N., Aguiar, A., Alaba, O., Booley, S., Malczyk, S., Nwosu, E. & Knai, C. et al. 2022. Adolescents’ Perspectives on the Drivers of Obesity Using a Group Model Building Approach: A South African Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(4):2160. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36326