Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOsman, Fatima
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T13:32:00Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T13:32:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBwanya v Master of the High Court [2021] ZACC 51, 2022 (4) BCLR 410 (CC), 2022 (3) SA 250 (CC) provided the Constitutional Court with the opportunity to reconsider its previous judgment of Volks v Robinson [2005] ZACC 2, 2005 (5) BCLR 446 (CC) and its implications for the inheritance rights of opposite-sex partners. The Court in Bwanya, in a much-anticipated decision, declared the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987 and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 of 1990 unconstitutional to the extent that the legislation did not provide for partners in a permanent life partnership in which the partners have undertaken reciprocal duties of support. The article argues that while Bwanya may be distinguishable from Volks, it would be an artificial—rather than meaningful—distinction that seeks to avoid a confrontation with Volks. The Bwanya and Volks cases raise the same substantive issue, being the rights of unmarried partners, and the Court should be applauded for confronting the issue directly rather than skirting the issue through superficial distinctions. Unfortunately, the Court’s approach in confronting and departing from Volks without declaring the previous judgment wrong is confusing and unconvincing. The judgment appears to represent a softening of the doctrine of stare decisis and a shift in the Court’s approach regarding the rights of unmarried parties, as legislative intervention in this area is not forthcoming.
dc.identifier.apacitationOsman, F. (2024). Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent. <i>Constitutional Court Review</i>, 441-470. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationOsman, Fatima "Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent." <i>Constitutional Court Review</i> (2024): 441-470. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationOsman, F. 2024. Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent. <i>Constitutional Court Review.</i>:441-470. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Osman, Fatima AB - Bwanya v Master of the High Court [2021] ZACC 51, 2022 (4) BCLR 410 (CC), 2022 (3) SA 250 (CC) provided the Constitutional Court with the opportunity to reconsider its previous judgment of Volks v Robinson [2005] ZACC 2, 2005 (5) BCLR 446 (CC) and its implications for the inheritance rights of opposite-sex partners. The Court in Bwanya, in a much-anticipated decision, declared the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987 and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 of 1990 unconstitutional to the extent that the legislation did not provide for partners in a permanent life partnership in which the partners have undertaken reciprocal duties of support. The article argues that while Bwanya may be distinguishable from Volks, it would be an artificial—rather than meaningful—distinction that seeks to avoid a confrontation with Volks. The Bwanya and Volks cases raise the same substantive issue, being the rights of unmarried partners, and the Court should be applauded for confronting the issue directly rather than skirting the issue through superficial distinctions. Unfortunately, the Court’s approach in confronting and departing from Volks without declaring the previous judgment wrong is confusing and unconvincing. The judgment appears to represent a softening of the doctrine of stare decisis and a shift in the Court’s approach regarding the rights of unmarried parties, as legislative intervention in this area is not forthcoming. DA - 2024 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Constitutional Court Review KW - inheritance KW - maintenance KW - precedent KW - succession LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2024 T1 - Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent TI - Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationOsman F. Bwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent. Constitutional Court Review. 2024;:441-470. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41645.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Law
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceConstitutional Court Review
dc.source.pagination441-470
dc.subjectinheritance
dc.subjectmaintenance
dc.subjectprecedent
dc.subjectsuccession
dc.titleBwanya v Master: A Softening of the Doctrine of Precedent
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
osman-2024-bwanya-v-master-a-softening-of-the-doctrine-of-precedent.pdf
Size:
185.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles