The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox)

dc.contributor.advisorChadwick, Peter Jen_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorHoffmann, Timmen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGreengrass, Catherineen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-10T08:52:08Z
dc.date.available2017-11-10T08:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2004en_ZA
dc.date.updated2017-03-10T15:20:53Z
dc.description.abstractHarvesting of Aloeferox was estimated (in 1996) to bring in an annual income ofR4 million per year to rural communities alone - a vital source of income for full-time tappers who rely solely on Aloe ferox as their only form of financial survival. They are joined on occasion by casual-tappers who rely on tapping to supplement their incomes in times of hardship (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Landowner's also benefit by allowing harvesting on their land in exchange for a percentage of the harvest (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Trade in bitters sap or gel far outweighs that of other plant parts so care is taken by harvesters to keep the plants alive for future tapping. Leaves from only the lower third of the leaf rosette ( 10 - 15 leaves) are harvested, and 2 - 4 cm at the base of the leaves are left to prevent damage to vascular tissues (Newton and Vaughan 1996, Mac Farlane 2004). Populations are only harvested every 18 - 36 months allowing plants to recover from the loss of leaf material. Plants suffering from insect-infestation or disease are not harvested to avoid weakening the plant further and possibly causing death (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Effort is also made by landowners to relocate plants growing in areas they plan to transform and to monitor harvesting activities on their properties (Newton and Vaughan 1996). The vested interest in keeping the plants alive has inadvertently assured the preservation of populations at past harvesting levels although no formal conservation or resource management policy presently exists for A. ferox (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Effects of harvesting, which are not limited to the direct effect of leaf removal on the plant but include indirect effects - such as reduced reproductive output, reduced sap production and even trampling of recruits - have nonetheless raised concern for the long-term survival of populations (Newton and Vaughan 1996). This study addressed some of the indirect effects of harvesting on Aloe ferox on both population and individual plants levels. On the population level plant density, mortality, susceptibility to disease and sizeclass structure was compared between unharvested and harvested populations. On the individual plant level vegetative traits, flower production and sap production were compared between unharvested and harvested plants. One of few other studies on ecology of A. ferox by Hoffman (1988) assessed some of these characteristics for a population in Port Elizabeth, South Africa.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationGreengrass, C. (2004). <i>The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox)</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26130en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationGreengrass, Catherine. <i>"The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox)."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26130en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationGreengrass, C. 2004. The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox). University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Greengrass, Catherine AB - Harvesting of Aloeferox was estimated (in 1996) to bring in an annual income ofR4 million per year to rural communities alone - a vital source of income for full-time tappers who rely solely on Aloe ferox as their only form of financial survival. They are joined on occasion by casual-tappers who rely on tapping to supplement their incomes in times of hardship (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Landowner's also benefit by allowing harvesting on their land in exchange for a percentage of the harvest (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Trade in bitters sap or gel far outweighs that of other plant parts so care is taken by harvesters to keep the plants alive for future tapping. Leaves from only the lower third of the leaf rosette ( 10 - 15 leaves) are harvested, and 2 - 4 cm at the base of the leaves are left to prevent damage to vascular tissues (Newton and Vaughan 1996, Mac Farlane 2004). Populations are only harvested every 18 - 36 months allowing plants to recover from the loss of leaf material. Plants suffering from insect-infestation or disease are not harvested to avoid weakening the plant further and possibly causing death (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Effort is also made by landowners to relocate plants growing in areas they plan to transform and to monitor harvesting activities on their properties (Newton and Vaughan 1996). The vested interest in keeping the plants alive has inadvertently assured the preservation of populations at past harvesting levels although no formal conservation or resource management policy presently exists for A. ferox (Newton and Vaughan 1996). Effects of harvesting, which are not limited to the direct effect of leaf removal on the plant but include indirect effects - such as reduced reproductive output, reduced sap production and even trampling of recruits - have nonetheless raised concern for the long-term survival of populations (Newton and Vaughan 1996). This study addressed some of the indirect effects of harvesting on Aloe ferox on both population and individual plants levels. On the population level plant density, mortality, susceptibility to disease and sizeclass structure was compared between unharvested and harvested populations. On the individual plant level vegetative traits, flower production and sap production were compared between unharvested and harvested plants. One of few other studies on ecology of A. ferox by Hoffman (1988) assessed some of these characteristics for a population in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. DA - 2004 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2004 T1 - The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox) TI - The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox) UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26130 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/26130
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationGreengrass C. The effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox). [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Biological Sciences, 2004 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26130en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Biological Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherSystematics and Biodiversity Sciencesen_ZA
dc.subject.otherBotanyen_ZA
dc.titleThe effects of leaf harvesting on the morphology, reproduction and sap production of the Cape Aloe (Aloe Ferox)en_ZA
dc.typeBachelor Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelHonours
dc.type.qualificationnameBSc (Hons)en_ZA
uct.type.filetype
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Greengrass_effects_leaf_2004_1.pdf
Size:
479.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections