A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement
| dc.contributor.advisor | Devine, D J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Blum, Jan Burkhard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-20T10:45:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-20T10:45:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2024-07-11T12:06:51Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | On May 9, 1950 Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister, announced his proposal to place the whole French and German steel production under a common High Authority which allowed other European countries the opportunity to participate. In his proposal he took care to provide for the establishment of a court of justice subjecting the new authority to judicial control. One year later, in April, 1951 the European Coal and Steel Treaty (ECSC) was signed in Paris creating the Court of Justice, which was intended to ensure that the new community was governed by democratic principles and the rule of law. Following this, the ratification debates took place in the parliaments of the six countries. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Blum, J. B. (1997). <i>A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement</i>. (). ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Marine and Environmental Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Blum, Jan Burkhard. <i>"A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement."</i> ., ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Marine and Environmental Law, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Blum, J.B. 1997. A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement. . ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Marine and Environmental Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Blum, Jan Burkhard AB - On May 9, 1950 Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister, announced his proposal to place the whole French and German steel production under a common High Authority which allowed other European countries the opportunity to participate. In his proposal he took care to provide for the establishment of a court of justice subjecting the new authority to judicial control. One year later, in April, 1951 the European Coal and Steel Treaty (ECSC) was signed in Paris creating the Court of Justice, which was intended to ensure that the new community was governed by democratic principles and the rule of law. Following this, the ratification debates took place in the parliaments of the six countries. DA - 1997 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 1997 T1 - ETD: A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement TI - ETD: A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Blum JB. A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement. []. ,Faculty of Law ,Institute of Marine and Environmental Law, 1997 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Institute of Marine and Environmental Law | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Law | |
| dc.subject | Law | |
| dc.title | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement | |
| dc.type | Thesis / Dissertation | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | LLM |