The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended

dc.contributor.advisorZuidgeest, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorMalan, Christopher Cyril Martin
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-19T14:08:52Z
dc.date.available2025-06-19T14:08:52Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.date.updated2024-07-11T08:30:33Z
dc.description.abstract[pg 2 missing] On 1 November 1983 Parliament promulgated The Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, Act 105 of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), which repealed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 of the United Kingdom insofar as it applied in relation to the Republic of South Africa. The Act revolutionised the law applicable to admiralty proceedings in the Republic of South Africa and answered the need for a codified and modern approach toward admiralty law as applied in South Africa, which had been advocated by maritime concerns and jurists for many years. The Act has been described as one which contained "novel, unusual and at times far-reaching provisions” and that in being enacted it was the intention of the Legislature: "to introduce a remedial measure designed to provide what is nowadays referred to as 'a new dispensation' in respect of maritime claims and their enforcement in South Africa". Many statutory rights and remedies not previously part of the English admiralty law as applied in the Supreme Courts of the Republic of South Africa were introduced by the Act. With the extension in the category of "maritime claims" now available to the claimant came a statutory extension of the Court's powers to adjudicate on matters maritime in -terms of the Act brought by "the wandering litigants" of the maritime community.
dc.identifier.apacitationMalan, C. C. M. (1998). <i>The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationMalan, Christopher Cyril Martin. <i>"The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMalan, C.C.M. 1998. The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin AB - [pg 2 missing] On 1 November 1983 Parliament promulgated The Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, Act 105 of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), which repealed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 of the United Kingdom insofar as it applied in relation to the Republic of South Africa. The Act revolutionised the law applicable to admiralty proceedings in the Republic of South Africa and answered the need for a codified and modern approach toward admiralty law as applied in South Africa, which had been advocated by maritime concerns and jurists for many years. The Act has been described as one which contained "novel, unusual and at times far-reaching provisions” and that in being enacted it was the intention of the Legislature: "to introduce a remedial measure designed to provide what is nowadays referred to as 'a new dispensation' in respect of maritime claims and their enforcement in South Africa". Many statutory rights and remedies not previously part of the English admiralty law as applied in the Supreme Courts of the Republic of South Africa were introduced by the Act. With the extension in the category of "maritime claims" now available to the claimant came a statutory extension of the Court's powers to adjudicate on matters maritime in -terms of the Act brought by "the wandering litigants" of the maritime community. DA - 1998 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Commercial Law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 1998 T1 - The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended TI - The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationMalan CCM. The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 1998 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Commercial Law
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Law
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subjectCommercial Law
dc.titleThe doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
dc.typeThesis / Dissertation
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelLLM
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_law_1998_malan christopher cyril martin.pdf
Size:
2.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections