Correlating standard penetration test and dynamic probe super heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
Journal Article
2011
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
License
Series
Abstract
This paper presents a statistical method used to develop an empirical equivalence between the
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH) in sandy material.
Penetration resistance values from the two tests are often taken as equivalent for design purposes,
as the same drive energy is used in both. SPT and DPSH resistance values from different geological
depositional and weathering environments were examined. The data came from the following
areas across southern Africa: Matola in Mozambique, Gope in Botswana, Umdloti and Cape Town in
South Africa, and Illha de Luanda in Angola. It was apparent that energy losses were greater in the
DPSH test than in the SPT, leading to higher resistance values in the former. The SPT is carried out
within a borehole, whereas the DPSH is continuously driven into the soil. The dynamic force applied
to the DPSH rods causes soil to fill the small air annulus around the rods, exerting a frictional
resistance. The different geological settings of the test sites revealed that, although different factors
cause the friction, the equivalence varied in a similar manner. Hence a single correlation formula is
suggested to determine equivalent SPT values from raw DPSH resistance values.
Description
Reference:
MacRobert, C., Kalumba, D., & Beales, P. (2011). Correlating standard penetration test and dynamic probe super heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 53(1), 46-54.