Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorBowen, Paul
dc.contributor.authorGovender, Rajen
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-19T12:24:44Z
dc.date.available2016-05-19T12:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-23
dc.date.updated2016-05-18T15:41:07Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour. In exploring these issues, various studies have employed an 11-item AIDS-related knowledge scale (Kalichman and Simbayi, AIDS Care 16:572-580, 2004) and a 9-item stigma scale (Kalichman et al., AIDS Behav 9:135-143, 2005), but little evidence exists confirming the psychometric properties of these scales. Methods: Using survey data from 512 construction workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, this research examines the validity and reliability of the two scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency tests. Results: From confirmatory factor analysis, a revised 10-item knowledge scale was developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.675, CFI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.038, and Hoelter (95 %) =393). A revised 8-item stigma scale was also developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.929, CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.045, and Hoelter (95 %) = 380). Both revised scales demonstrated good model fit and all factor loadings were significant (p < 0.01). Reliability analysis demonstrated excellent to good internal consistency, with alpha values of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Both revised scales also demonstrated satisfactory convergent and divergent validity. Limitations of the original survey from which the data was obtained include the failure to properly account for respondent selection of language for completion of the survey, use of ethnicity as a proxy for identifying the native language of participants, the limited geographical area from which the survey data was collected, and the limitations associated with the convenience sample. A limitation of the validation study was the lack of available data for a more robust examination of reliability beyond internal consistency, such as test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The revised knowledge and stigma scales offered here hold considerable promise as measures of AIDS related knowledge and stigma among South African construction workers.en_ZA
dc.identifier10.1186/s12889-016-2756-z
dc.identifier.apacitationBowen, P., Govender, R., & Edwards, P. (2016). Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa. <i>BMC Public Health</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19718en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationBowen, Paul, Rajen Govender, and Peter Edwards "Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa." <i>BMC Public Health</i> (2016) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19718en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBowen, P., Govender, R., & Edwards, P. (2016). Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Bowen, Paul AU - Govender, Rajen AU - Edwards, Peter AB - Background: Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour. In exploring these issues, various studies have employed an 11-item AIDS-related knowledge scale (Kalichman and Simbayi, AIDS Care 16:572-580, 2004) and a 9-item stigma scale (Kalichman et al., AIDS Behav 9:135-143, 2005), but little evidence exists confirming the psychometric properties of these scales. Methods: Using survey data from 512 construction workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, this research examines the validity and reliability of the two scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency tests. Results: From confirmatory factor analysis, a revised 10-item knowledge scale was developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.675, CFI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.038, and Hoelter (95 %) =393). A revised 8-item stigma scale was also developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.929, CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.045, and Hoelter (95 %) = 380). Both revised scales demonstrated good model fit and all factor loadings were significant (p < 0.01). Reliability analysis demonstrated excellent to good internal consistency, with alpha values of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Both revised scales also demonstrated satisfactory convergent and divergent validity. Limitations of the original survey from which the data was obtained include the failure to properly account for respondent selection of language for completion of the survey, use of ethnicity as a proxy for identifying the native language of participants, the limited geographical area from which the survey data was collected, and the limitations associated with the convenience sample. A limitation of the validation study was the lack of available data for a more robust examination of reliability beyond internal consistency, such as test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The revised knowledge and stigma scales offered here hold considerable promise as measures of AIDS related knowledge and stigma among South African construction workers. DA - 2016-01-23 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - BMC Public Health KW - HIV/AIDS KW - AIDS-related knowledge KW - AIDS-related stigma KW - Measurement scales KW - Construction workers KW - South Africa LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2016 SM - 1471-2458 T1 - Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa TI - Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19718 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/19718
dc.identifier.urihttp://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-016-2756-z
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationBowen P, Govender R, Edwards P. Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2016; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19718.en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Construction Economics and Managementen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.holderBowen et al.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_ZA
dc.sourceBMC Public Healthen_ZA
dc.source.urihttp://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/
dc.subjectHIV/AIDS
dc.subjectAIDS-related knowledge
dc.subjectAIDS-related stigma
dc.subjectMeasurement scales
dc.subjectConstruction workers
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.titleValidating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12889_2016_Article_2756.pdf
Size:
794.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections