Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWaldron, M
dc.contributor.authorGerneke, D
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-29T09:38:51Z
dc.date.available2016-07-29T09:38:51Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.date.updated2016-07-29T08:24:14Z
dc.description.abstractWith a secondary detector and a backscatter detector, total primary increment counts on the same otoliths were similar, but more samples could be counted using the backscatter detector and the percentage of unreadable area was consistently lower with this technique.en_ZA
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01373.x
dc.identifier.apacitationWaldron, M., & Gerneke, D. (1997). Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths. <i>Journal of Fish Biology</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21015en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationWaldron, M, and D Gerneke "Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths." <i>Journal of Fish Biology</i> (1997) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21015en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWaldron, M. E., & Gerneke, D. A. (1997). Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths. Journal of fish biology, 50(2), 450-454.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0022-1112en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Waldron, M AU - Gerneke, D AB - With a secondary detector and a backscatter detector, total primary increment counts on the same otoliths were similar, but more samples could be counted using the backscatter detector and the percentage of unreadable area was consistently lower with this technique. DA - 1997 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Journal of Fish Biology LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 1997 SM - 0022-1112 T1 - Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths TI - Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21015 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/21015
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationWaldron M, Gerneke D. Comparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths. Journal of Fish Biology. 1997; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21015.en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.publisherWileyen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_ZA
dc.sourceJournal of Fish Biologyen_ZA
dc.source.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649
dc.subject.otherprimary growth increments
dc.subject.othersecondary detector
dc.subject.otherbackscatter detector
dc.titleComparison of two scanning electron microscope techniques for examining daily growth increments on fish otoliths.en_ZA
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Waldron_Comparison_two_scanning_1997.pdf
Size:
139.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles