Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorIbnidris, Aliaa
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Janelle N
dc.contributor.authorStubbs, Marissa
dc.contributor.authorPiumatti, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorGovia, Ishtar
dc.contributor.authorAlbanese, Emiliano
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T13:56:12Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T13:56:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-18
dc.date.updated2022-07-24T03:11:45Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting. Objectives To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD. Methods and analysis We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results. Conclusion Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties.en_US
dc.identifier.apacitationIbnidris, A., Robinson, J. N., Stubbs, M., Piumatti, G., Govia, I., & Albanese, E. (2022). Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review. <i>Systematic Reviews</i>, 11(1), 144. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationIbnidris, Aliaa, Janelle N Robinson, Marissa Stubbs, Giovanni Piumatti, Ishtar Govia, and Emiliano Albanese "Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review." <i>Systematic Reviews</i> 11, 1. (2022): 144. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationIbnidris, A., Robinson, J.N., Stubbs, M., Piumatti, G., Govia, I. & Albanese, E. 2022. Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review. <i>Systematic Reviews.</i> 11(1):144. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Ibnidris, Aliaa AU - Robinson, Janelle N AU - Stubbs, Marissa AU - Piumatti, Giovanni AU - Govia, Ishtar AU - Albanese, Emiliano AB - Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting. Objectives To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD. Methods and analysis We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results. Conclusion Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties. DA - 2022-07-18 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town IS - 1 J1 - Systematic Reviews KW - Subjective KW - Cognitive dysfunction KW - Preclinical AD KW - Measurement properties KW - Assessment KW - PROM LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2022 T1 - Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review TI - Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationIbnidris A, Robinson JN, Stubbs M, Piumatti G, Govia I, Albanese E. Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2022;11(1):144. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38448.en_ZA
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Healthen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSystematic Reviewsen_US
dc.source.journalissue1en_US
dc.source.journalvolume11en_US
dc.source.pagination144en_US
dc.source.urihttps://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/
dc.subjectSubjectiveen_US
dc.subjectCognitive dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectPreclinical ADen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement propertiesen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectPROMen_US
dc.titleEvaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13643_2022_Article_2018.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles