The Legacy of Daantjie Oosthuizen: Revisiting the Liberal Defence of Academic Freedom
Journal Article
2005
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
African Sociological Review
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
CODESRIA
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
License
Series
Abstract
The classic formulations of the liberal notion of academic freedom in the South African context date from the period of the late 1950s and early 1960s when the ‘Open Universities’ had to define their stance in the face of the onslaught of Verwoerdian apartheid ideology and rampant Afrikaner nationalism. Adumbrated in the hallowed T. B. Davie formula (‘our freedom from external interference in (a) who shall teach, (b) what we teach, (c) how we teach, and (d) whom we teach’) and articulated more extensively in two short books, The Open Universities in South Africa (1957) and The Open Universities in South Africa and Academic Freedom, 1957-1974 (1974), jointly published by the universities of Cape Town and Witwatersrand, these classic formulations were, above all, concerned with a defence of academic freedom essentially conceived as the institutional autonomy of the university vis-à-vis possible interference or regulation by the state. Forty years on, it is time to revisit these classic defences of academic freedom from the very different vantage point of the newly democratic South Africa. Both the external and the internal contexts of academic freedom have radically changed. Not only has the statutory framework of the apartheid state been dismantled and the ideological force of Afrikaner nationalism spent but the former ‘open universities’ have themselves been transformed in various ways (though not in others). The relatively small-scale collegial institutions almost wholly dependent on state subsidies are now part of a massively expanded tertiary sector subject to the macro-politics of educational restructuring as much as the domestic impact of the managerial revolution within the university itself. In this new context academic freedom no longer has to be defended primarily against the external threat of state intervention; rather it has to be defined in relation to basic democratic norms of accountability and in the often non-collegial context of the contemporary academic workplace.
Description
Reference:
du Toit, A. (2005). The Legacy of Daantjie Oosthuizen: Revisiting the Liberal Defence of Academic Freedom. African Sociological Review, 9(1): 40-61.