Talking about rape – and why it matters adjudicating rape in the Western Cape High Court
Journal Article
2014
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
South African Crime Quarterly
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
Series
Abstract
This article asks the question: how do judges know what rape is and what it is not? The statutory definition contained in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act1 (SORMA) guides courts in adjudicating rape cases, and as such the definition is theirs to interpret and implement. This article analyses a small selection of recent judgements of the Western Cape High Court2 (WCHC) for answers. The article begins by establishing why judgements are an important source for understanding what rape means in society at large; it then discusses the relationship between power, language, and the law. This is followed by specific analyses of cases that show how patriarchy still defines how judges express themselves about rape. It concludes by looking at the institutional factors that discourage judges from adopting new ways of talking about rape, and their constitutional mandate to do so.
Description
Reference:
Moreland, S. (2014). Talking about rape-and why it matters: adjudicating rape in the Western Cape High Court. SA Crime Quarterly, (47), 05-15.