The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form?
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bradfield, Graham B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Msiza, Sharon Phumzile | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-13T11:44:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-13T11:44:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2020-02-12T11:11:07Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | For over a period of over sixty years, South Africa has applied the provisions of the MSA enacted in 1951 to matters relating to shipowner’s right to limit liability. Since then, Parliament has made several attempts at amending the MSA with no success. However, determining whether South Africa should implement the proposed amendments in terms of the MSA Draft Bill, is an inquiry that should not only include a comparison of the old order with the newly proposed order, but, it should also require reasons as to why the reform should be achieved in a particular manner. This is important because knowing what the discrepancies of the current dispensation are, will enable us to evaluate whether the newly proposed amendments will address them. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Msiza, S. P. (2019). <i>The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form?</i>. (). ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31101 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Msiza, Sharon Phumzile. <i>"The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form?."</i> ., ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31101 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Msiza, S. 2019. The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form?. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Msiza, Sharon Phumzile AB - For over a period of over sixty years, South Africa has applied the provisions of the MSA enacted in 1951 to matters relating to shipowner’s right to limit liability. Since then, Parliament has made several attempts at amending the MSA with no success. However, determining whether South Africa should implement the proposed amendments in terms of the MSA Draft Bill, is an inquiry that should not only include a comparison of the old order with the newly proposed order, but, it should also require reasons as to why the reform should be achieved in a particular manner. This is important because knowing what the discrepancies of the current dispensation are, will enable us to evaluate whether the newly proposed amendments will address them. DA - 2019 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Commercial Law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2019 T1 - The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form? TI - The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31101 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31101 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Msiza SP. The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form?. []. ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 2019 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31101 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Commercial Law | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Law | |
| dc.subject | Commercial Law | |
| dc.title | The First Draft Merchant Shipping, Bill: Should South Africa implement the proposed amendments in section 271 of the Bill, in its current form? | |
| dc.type | Master Thesis | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
| dc.type.qualificationname | LLM |