Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?

dc.contributor.authorAbraham, Haim
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T13:35:45Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T13:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-01-13T11:15:38Z
dc.description.abstractA bank, acting as a central planner under aggregate full certainty, optimizes liquidity allocation by sharing risk between discrete number of depositors. This paper demonstrates the following. (a) It is sufficient to rule out a bank run if all depositors inform the bank their types, patient or impatient, in advance, in a noncommittal manner. There cannot be a bank run because depositors’ strategic behaviour induces the bank to act as a central planner under aggregate full certainty. (b) The impossibility of a bank run is consistent with the price mechanism in partial equilibrium; but it may be inconsistent with the price mechanism in general disequilibrium. (c) The paper concludes that the management of risk sharing by banks is not a cause for bank runs.
dc.identifier.apacitationAbraham, H. (2010). Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?. <i>South African Journal of Business Management</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28227en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationAbraham, Haim "Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?." <i>South African Journal of Business Management</i> (2010) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28227en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAbraham, H. (2010). Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?. South African Journal of Business Management, 41(1), 51-55.
dc.identifier.ris TY - AU - Abraham, Haim AB - A bank, acting as a central planner under aggregate full certainty, optimizes liquidity allocation by sharing risk between discrete number of depositors. This paper demonstrates the following. (a) It is sufficient to rule out a bank run if all depositors inform the bank their types, patient or impatient, in advance, in a noncommittal manner. There cannot be a bank run because depositors’ strategic behaviour induces the bank to act as a central planner under aggregate full certainty. (b) The impossibility of a bank run is consistent with the price mechanism in partial equilibrium; but it may be inconsistent with the price mechanism in general disequilibrium. (c) The paper concludes that the management of risk sharing by banks is not a cause for bank runs. DA - 2010 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal of Business Management LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2010 T1 - Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs? TI - Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28227 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/28227
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationAbraham H. Is management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?. South African Journal of Business Management. 2010; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28227.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Economicsen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Commerceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceSouth African Journal of Business Management
dc.source.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/journal/busman
dc.titleIs management of risk sharing by banks a cause for bank runs?
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abraham_Is_management_risk_2010.pdf
Size:
55.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections