The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison

dc.contributor.advisorCorreia, Carlosen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Kyle Stephenen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-30T13:16:02Z
dc.date.available2015-11-30T13:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2015en_ZA
dc.description.abstractSouth Africa's electricity tariff determinations have been a matter of much public debate. This has been highlighted in popular media in South Africa, with above inflation increases in electricity tariffs allowed by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) in Multi-Year Price Determination (MYPD) 2 and MYPD 3. However these increases are below those applied for by Eskom. Estimating the cost of equity capital is a key element of the tariff determination process. This study therefore aims to evaluate the cost of equity methodologies used by regulators, and to assess whether NERSA's (South Africa) methodology is in line with international best practice. This study analysed the published cost of equity methodologies of 14 electricity regulators operating within developed and developing economies. A review of academic literature indicates that the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) understates the returns of low beta stocks, such as utilities. Furthermore, the Fama and French Three Factor model (FF3F) has been shown to have better explanatory power and results in higher estimates of the cost of equity. In spite of these empirical findings, this study found a preference for the CAPM among regulators, with no regulators using the FF3F model. The CAPM is selected due to its widespread use and the fact that it is simple to implement. This finding indicates that regulators are systemically under-compensating utilities for the risk undertaken. NERSA's (South Africa) cost of equity methodology was found to be in line with regulatory methodology, although its lack of consideration of alternatives and its relative lack of disclosure into the estimation does result in less transparency and potentially less reliable estimates of the cost of equity. Until a definitive answer has been reached, it is likely that the CAPM will continue to be used in a regulatory environment.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationGraham, K. S. (2015). <i>The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Commerce ,Department of Finance and Tax. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15473en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationGraham, Kyle Stephen. <i>"The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Commerce ,Department of Finance and Tax, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15473en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationGraham, K. 2015. The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison. University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Graham, Kyle Stephen AB - South Africa's electricity tariff determinations have been a matter of much public debate. This has been highlighted in popular media in South Africa, with above inflation increases in electricity tariffs allowed by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) in Multi-Year Price Determination (MYPD) 2 and MYPD 3. However these increases are below those applied for by Eskom. Estimating the cost of equity capital is a key element of the tariff determination process. This study therefore aims to evaluate the cost of equity methodologies used by regulators, and to assess whether NERSA's (South Africa) methodology is in line with international best practice. This study analysed the published cost of equity methodologies of 14 electricity regulators operating within developed and developing economies. A review of academic literature indicates that the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) understates the returns of low beta stocks, such as utilities. Furthermore, the Fama and French Three Factor model (FF3F) has been shown to have better explanatory power and results in higher estimates of the cost of equity. In spite of these empirical findings, this study found a preference for the CAPM among regulators, with no regulators using the FF3F model. The CAPM is selected due to its widespread use and the fact that it is simple to implement. This finding indicates that regulators are systemically under-compensating utilities for the risk undertaken. NERSA's (South Africa) cost of equity methodology was found to be in line with regulatory methodology, although its lack of consideration of alternatives and its relative lack of disclosure into the estimation does result in less transparency and potentially less reliable estimates of the cost of equity. Until a definitive answer has been reached, it is likely that the CAPM will continue to be used in a regulatory environment. DA - 2015 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2015 T1 - The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison TI - The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15473 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/15473
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationGraham KS. The cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparison. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Commerce ,Department of Finance and Tax, 2015 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15473en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Finance and Taxen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Commerceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherFinancial Managementen_ZA
dc.titleThe cost of equity capital in a regulatory environment: an international comparisonen_ZA
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationnameMComen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_com_2015_grhkyl001-thesis (1).pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections