Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties

dc.contributor.advisorKulikova, Maria
dc.contributor.advisorTaylor, David
dc.contributor.advisorMahomed, Obeid
dc.contributor.authorWakandigara, Vykta
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T10:30:55Z
dc.date.available2020-02-25T10:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2020-02-25T09:05:41Z
dc.description.abstractOne of the central debates in finance concerns the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)—wherein markets are assumed to be efficient in the absolute sense. However, the possibility of time-varying weak-form market efficiency has received increasing attention in recent years. Under the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) it is postulated that market efficiency is dynamic, which advocates using models with non-constant coefficients. The concept of evolving efficiency has yielded a Test for Evolving Efficiency (TEE) and following that, a Generalised Test for Evolving Efficiency (GTEE) – both with an associated Kalman filtering (KF) technique. Unfortunately, these methods assume that the inherent stochastic processes are Gaussian despite widespread evidence that many real financial time series are nonGaussian. Unlike the classical KF, modern filters such as the maximum correntropy Kalman filters (MCC-KF) have been shown to be less sensitive to non-Gaussian uncertainties. These filters utilise a similarity measure known as correntropy– which incorporates higher order information than the mean square criterion that is utilised in the classical KF. As a result, they have been shown to improve filter robustness against outliers or impulsive noises. In this paper, the South African and American stock markets are tested for adaptive market efficiency using both the standard KF and the MCC-KF. A simulation study shows that the MCC-KF is a more robust estimator of adaptive efficiency but it less accurately estimates unknown system parameters. The South African stock market is found to be inefficient prior to August 2004 but achieves efficiency thereafter. Testing the S&P500 does not provide evidence of inefficiency in the American stock markets. The GTEE, implemented with the MCC-KF, is selected as the bestperforming test for the S&P500.
dc.identifier.apacitationWakandigara, V. (2019). <i>Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties</i>. (). ,Faculty of Commerce ,African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31299en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationWakandigara, Vykta. <i>"Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties."</i> ., ,Faculty of Commerce ,African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31299en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWakandigara, V. 2019. Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Wakandigara, Vykta AB - One of the central debates in finance concerns the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)—wherein markets are assumed to be efficient in the absolute sense. However, the possibility of time-varying weak-form market efficiency has received increasing attention in recent years. Under the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) it is postulated that market efficiency is dynamic, which advocates using models with non-constant coefficients. The concept of evolving efficiency has yielded a Test for Evolving Efficiency (TEE) and following that, a Generalised Test for Evolving Efficiency (GTEE) – both with an associated Kalman filtering (KF) technique. Unfortunately, these methods assume that the inherent stochastic processes are Gaussian despite widespread evidence that many real financial time series are nonGaussian. Unlike the classical KF, modern filters such as the maximum correntropy Kalman filters (MCC-KF) have been shown to be less sensitive to non-Gaussian uncertainties. These filters utilise a similarity measure known as correntropy– which incorporates higher order information than the mean square criterion that is utilised in the classical KF. As a result, they have been shown to improve filter robustness against outliers or impulsive noises. In this paper, the South African and American stock markets are tested for adaptive market efficiency using both the standard KF and the MCC-KF. A simulation study shows that the MCC-KF is a more robust estimator of adaptive efficiency but it less accurately estimates unknown system parameters. The South African stock market is found to be inefficient prior to August 2004 but achieves efficiency thereafter. Testing the S&P500 does not provide evidence of inefficiency in the American stock markets. The GTEE, implemented with the MCC-KF, is selected as the bestperforming test for the S&P500. DA - 2019 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Mathematical Finance LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2019 T1 - Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties TI - Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31299 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/31299
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationWakandigara V. Testing adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties. []. ,Faculty of Commerce ,African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management, 2019 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31299en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentAfrican Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Commerce
dc.subjectMathematical Finance
dc.titleTesting adaptive market efficiency in the presence of non-Gaussian uncertainties
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationnameMPhil
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_com_2019_wakandigara_vykta.pdf
Size:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections