Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms

dc.contributor.advisorDensmore, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorJian, Xue Jun
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T14:49:47Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T14:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-01-27T14:49:02Z
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing number of public institutions turning to online learning, there is a need to understand the process of online learning development and how it aligns with student priorities for online learning platforms. This is exacerbated by the onset of COVID-19, with many institutions hastening to move their courses online during the global lockdowns, making it even more a priority to understand online learning practice. Various studies have reported on best online learning practices but deviations from student priorities still exist in reality. In practice, courses are predominantly designed from the lecturer's perspective, and student perspectives are only incorporated through feedback from course evaluations. Students are rarely given a role in the design process and are therefore unable to sculpt out their design needs for online courses. One design approach which gives a design role to students is co-design. Codesign takes into account the perspectives of all stakeholders by allowing each stakeholder to equally participate in the design process. The participation of students in design and the degree of participation they take has rarely been articulated. How does the design approach from the lecturer's perspective, where students take no part in the design process, compare to the co-design approach, where maximum participation can be achieved? How do these design approaches contribute to the deviations from student priorities? The aim of this study was to understand the alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms and how deviations transpire. This research posited that a co-design approach, including the students as designers, might assist in alleviating these deviations. In the first part of the study, the researcher interviewed current students in an online course to understand their priorities for design. Results from the interviews were analysed and shared with students and lecturers, who were invited to prototype designs for a lesson module based on this feedback, first individually, then as a group. Another set of students were then invited to compare and evaluate the implemented prototypes in the final part of the study. The results demonstrated that a) expressed student learning priorities generally aligned with current knowledge of online learning design, b) a gap between design and reality exists for actual online course practices, c) design deviations from student priorities emerged at the beginning stages of the design process, where individual interpretation of design needs differed, d) design discussions and idea sharing during co-design alleviated these deviations, and e) co-design activities stunted the creativity of the team. Although co-design managed to bridge part of the gap between online learning platform design and student priorities, there are many factors that limit effective multistakeholder co-design. Depending on characteristics of individuals, team dynamics and design environment and conditions, the full benefits of co-design may not always be realized. Future works should explore ways of gaining mainstream adoption of design approaches such as co-design, to bridge the gap between design and reality in the online learning space.
dc.identifier.apacitationJian, X. J. (2021). <i>Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms</i>. (). ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Computer Science. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationJian, Xue Jun. <i>"Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms."</i> ., ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Computer Science, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationJian, X.J. 2021. Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms. . ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Computer Science. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Master Thesis AU - Jian, Xue Jun AB - With the increasing number of public institutions turning to online learning, there is a need to understand the process of online learning development and how it aligns with student priorities for online learning platforms. This is exacerbated by the onset of COVID-19, with many institutions hastening to move their courses online during the global lockdowns, making it even more a priority to understand online learning practice. Various studies have reported on best online learning practices but deviations from student priorities still exist in reality. In practice, courses are predominantly designed from the lecturer's perspective, and student perspectives are only incorporated through feedback from course evaluations. Students are rarely given a role in the design process and are therefore unable to sculpt out their design needs for online courses. One design approach which gives a design role to students is co-design. Codesign takes into account the perspectives of all stakeholders by allowing each stakeholder to equally participate in the design process. The participation of students in design and the degree of participation they take has rarely been articulated. How does the design approach from the lecturer's perspective, where students take no part in the design process, compare to the co-design approach, where maximum participation can be achieved? How do these design approaches contribute to the deviations from student priorities? The aim of this study was to understand the alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms and how deviations transpire. This research posited that a co-design approach, including the students as designers, might assist in alleviating these deviations. In the first part of the study, the researcher interviewed current students in an online course to understand their priorities for design. Results from the interviews were analysed and shared with students and lecturers, who were invited to prototype designs for a lesson module based on this feedback, first individually, then as a group. Another set of students were then invited to compare and evaluate the implemented prototypes in the final part of the study. The results demonstrated that a) expressed student learning priorities generally aligned with current knowledge of online learning design, b) a gap between design and reality exists for actual online course practices, c) design deviations from student priorities emerged at the beginning stages of the design process, where individual interpretation of design needs differed, d) design discussions and idea sharing during co-design alleviated these deviations, and e) co-design activities stunted the creativity of the team. Although co-design managed to bridge part of the gap between online learning platform design and student priorities, there are many factors that limit effective multistakeholder co-design. Depending on characteristics of individuals, team dynamics and design environment and conditions, the full benefits of co-design may not always be realized. Future works should explore ways of gaining mainstream adoption of design approaches such as co-design, to bridge the gap between design and reality in the online learning space. DA - 2021 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Computer Science LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2021 T1 - Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms TI - Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationJian XJ. Understanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms. []. ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Computer Science, 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35604en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Computer Science
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Science
dc.subjectComputer Science
dc.titleUnderstanding alignment between design approaches and student priorities for online learning platforms
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelMSc
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_sci_2021_jian xue jun.pdf
Size:
4.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections