Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hutchinson, Dale | |
| dc.contributor.author | Elsner, Kirsten | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-22T10:47:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-22T10:47:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-11-15T07:47:23Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | There are a number of circumstances in which parties, that enter into negotiations to conclude a contract, incur losses because the anticipated contract does not materialise. The parties could for example think that they concluded a contract, which is, however, void or an offeror sends together with his offer goods to a long known customer, wrongfully trusting that a contract will come about. Furthermore, the parties could have entered into lengthy negotiations about a costly project which do for some reason not ripen into a contractual agreement. In all these situations the parties might have made expenses with regard to the prospective contract that are now lost without any reward in return. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Elsner, K. (1999). <i>Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations</i>. (). ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Elsner, Kirsten. <i>"Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations."</i> ., ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Elsner, K. 1999. Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations. . ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Master Thesis AU - Elsner, Kirsten AB - There are a number of circumstances in which parties, that enter into negotiations to conclude a contract, incur losses because the anticipated contract does not materialise. The parties could for example think that they concluded a contract, which is, however, void or an offeror sends together with his offer goods to a long known customer, wrongfully trusting that a contract will come about. Furthermore, the parties could have entered into lengthy negotiations about a costly project which do for some reason not ripen into a contractual agreement. In all these situations the parties might have made expenses with regard to the prospective contract that are now lost without any reward in return. DA - 1999_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Commercial Law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 1999 T1 - Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations TI - Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Elsner K. Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations. []. ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Public Law, 1999 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35346 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Public Law | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Law | |
| dc.subject | Commercial Law | |
| dc.title | Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations | |
| dc.type | Master Thesis | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | LLM |