Muthi, Medicine and Witchcraft: Regulating 'African Science' in Post-Apartheid South Africa?
Journal Article
2005
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Social Dynamics
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
License
Series
Abstract
This paper comprises extracts from Adam Ashworth's book: Witchcraft, Violence and Democracy in South Africa (Chicago University Press, 2005) . It argues that the distinction between witchcraft and healing is essentially a moral one (healers and witches use supernatural forces supposedly for different ends) and that both activities fall under the rubric of 'African science '. Whereas proponents of 'Indigenous Knowledge Systems ' attempt, as part of a broader cultural project, to provide 'traditional' African healing with scientific status, others - starting with Montana's 1988 call to 'stop romanticizing the evil depredations of the sangoma' in order to Fee patients from the 'tyranny of superstition ' - emphasise the incommensurability of traditional healing practices with science. The paper concludes with a discussion of how such incommensurability makes it very difficult, if not impossible,for the post-apartheid state to regulate 'African science '.
Description
Reference:
Ashforth, A. (2005). Muthi, medicine and witchcraft: regulating ‘African science’in post-apartheid South Africa?. Social Dynamics, 31(2), 211-242.