Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders

dc.contributor.advisorMudenda, Kenny
dc.contributor.authorTafadzwa, Chikosha Franklin
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T10:25:06Z
dc.date.available2022-02-11T10:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-02-09T12:40:44Z
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this research was to identify a possible range where the use of deep I-plate girders primarily under bending stresses with thick web plates and no web stiffeners has economical or operational benefits than adoption of plate girder cross-sections with slender web plates reinforced with intermediate transverse stiffeners. The research focuses mainly on optimisation for bending moment resistance. Shear capacities of the cross-sections were also computed and compared because shear forces share a close relationship with bending moments being a derivative of the moment. The idea was that upon exhausting the capacity of the largest available rolled I-section, designers should not always tend to lean towards sections with slender web as is common practice encouraged by design standards to get the highest moment carrying capacity. Design codes or standards adopted by different countries and sometimes regions provide structural designers with guidelines on acceptable design practice. The latest South African design standards encourage the use of thin web plates with stiffeners to guard against premature buckling of the web whilst realising high bending moment resistance. This is due to the increased lever arm and having more material in the flange plates as explained in SASCH (2016). Though setting an upper limit on web slenderness βw, the South African steel design standard, SANS10162-1 allows designers to ignore the limit if calculations prove that buckling of the compression flange into the web will not occur under factored load levels. SASCH (2016) alludes to the possibility of there being benefits that can be realised from using thicker web plates than the theoretically recommended ones but it does not give a comprehensive insight as to the nature and extent of those benefits. As shown in the following chapters, not much research has been done to assess the benefits of adopting compact webs in plate girders. For a given cross-section area, different geometrical cross-section configurations were compared in an iterative process. The parameters under investigation were the moment resistance and shear carrying performance to mass ratios. Other design parameters of the elements were not to be compromised following recommended guidelines in the South African steel design standard, SANS10162-1. Additional knowledge gathered from research work detailed in the literature study was incorporated in the optimisation process but guidelines from SANS10162-1 took precedence. The exercise showed that for cross-section area requirements below 35.6x103mm2 to carry moments, wholly class 3 sections provide a competitive alternative to sections with class 4 webs and flanges below class 3 classification. They resist a lesser moment, but the differences are of small magnitudes. The class 3 sections showed significant improvements in terms of shear capacity. Over larger spans, sections with class 4 webs with intermediate transverse stiffeners and of similar mass per unit length become heavier and more expensive because of the increase in the number of stiffeners. The labour requirements and consumables for fabrication also increase because of the stiffener requirements for sections with class 4 webs as shown in the cost estimates.
dc.identifier.apacitationTafadzwa, C. F. (2021). <i>Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders</i>. (). ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationTafadzwa, Chikosha Franklin. <i>"Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders."</i> ., ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationTafadzwa, C.F. 2021. Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders. . ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Master Thesis AU - Tafadzwa, Chikosha Franklin AB - The aim of this research was to identify a possible range where the use of deep I-plate girders primarily under bending stresses with thick web plates and no web stiffeners has economical or operational benefits than adoption of plate girder cross-sections with slender web plates reinforced with intermediate transverse stiffeners. The research focuses mainly on optimisation for bending moment resistance. Shear capacities of the cross-sections were also computed and compared because shear forces share a close relationship with bending moments being a derivative of the moment. The idea was that upon exhausting the capacity of the largest available rolled I-section, designers should not always tend to lean towards sections with slender web as is common practice encouraged by design standards to get the highest moment carrying capacity. Design codes or standards adopted by different countries and sometimes regions provide structural designers with guidelines on acceptable design practice. The latest South African design standards encourage the use of thin web plates with stiffeners to guard against premature buckling of the web whilst realising high bending moment resistance. This is due to the increased lever arm and having more material in the flange plates as explained in SASCH (2016). Though setting an upper limit on web slenderness βw, the South African steel design standard, SANS10162-1 allows designers to ignore the limit if calculations prove that buckling of the compression flange into the web will not occur under factored load levels. SASCH (2016) alludes to the possibility of there being benefits that can be realised from using thicker web plates than the theoretically recommended ones but it does not give a comprehensive insight as to the nature and extent of those benefits. As shown in the following chapters, not much research has been done to assess the benefits of adopting compact webs in plate girders. For a given cross-section area, different geometrical cross-section configurations were compared in an iterative process. The parameters under investigation were the moment resistance and shear carrying performance to mass ratios. Other design parameters of the elements were not to be compromised following recommended guidelines in the South African steel design standard, SANS10162-1. Additional knowledge gathered from research work detailed in the literature study was incorporated in the optimisation process but guidelines from SANS10162-1 took precedence. The exercise showed that for cross-section area requirements below 35.6x103mm2 to carry moments, wholly class 3 sections provide a competitive alternative to sections with class 4 webs and flanges below class 3 classification. They resist a lesser moment, but the differences are of small magnitudes. The class 3 sections showed significant improvements in terms of shear capacity. Over larger spans, sections with class 4 webs with intermediate transverse stiffeners and of similar mass per unit length become heavier and more expensive because of the increase in the number of stiffeners. The labour requirements and consumables for fabrication also increase because of the stiffener requirements for sections with class 4 webs as shown in the cost estimates. DA - 2021_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Civil Engineering LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2021 T1 - Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders TI - Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationTafadzwa CF. Assessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders. []. ,Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment ,Department of Civil Engineering, 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35693en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
dc.subjectCivil Engineering
dc.titleAssessing possible economic or operational benefits of class 3 webs without stiffeners vs class 4 webs with stiffeners in steel plate girders
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelMSc (Eng)
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_ebe_2021_tafadzwa chikosha franklin.pdf
Size:
4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections