Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project
| dc.contributor.author | King, Thomas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hodgkinson-Williams, Cheryl-Ann | |
| dc.contributor.author | Willmers, Michelle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Walji, Sukaina | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Global South | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-26T10:47:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-26T10:47:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Open Research has the potential to advance the scientific process by improving the transparency, rigour, scope and reach of research, but choosing to experiment with Open Research carries with it a set of ideological, legal, technical and operational considerations. Researchers, especially those in resource-constrained situations, may not be aware of the complex interrelations between these different domains of open practice, the additional resources required, or how Open Research can support traditional research practices. Using the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project as an example, this paper attempts to demonstrate the interrelation between ideological, legal, technical and operational openness; the resources that conducting Open Research requires; and the benefits of an iterative, strategic approach to one’s own Open Research practice. In this paper we discuss the value of a critical approach towards Open Research to ensure better coherence between ‘open’ ideology (embodied in strategic intention) and ‘open’ practice (the everyday operationalisation of open principles). This paper first appeared in Open Praxis, Volume 8 Number 2. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | King, T., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Willmers, M., & Walji, S. (2016). Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project. <i>Open Praxis</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23328 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | King, Thomas, Cheryl-Ann Hodgkinson-Williams, Michelle Willmers, and Sukaina Walji "Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project." <i>Open Praxis</i> (2016) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23328 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | King, T., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Willmers, M. & Walji, S. (2016). Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project. Open Praxis, 8(2), pp. 81–91. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - King, Thomas AU - Hodgkinson-Williams, Cheryl-Ann AU - Willmers, Michelle AU - Walji, Sukaina AB - Open Research has the potential to advance the scientific process by improving the transparency, rigour, scope and reach of research, but choosing to experiment with Open Research carries with it a set of ideological, legal, technical and operational considerations. Researchers, especially those in resource-constrained situations, may not be aware of the complex interrelations between these different domains of open practice, the additional resources required, or how Open Research can support traditional research practices. Using the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project as an example, this paper attempts to demonstrate the interrelation between ideological, legal, technical and operational openness; the resources that conducting Open Research requires; and the benefits of an iterative, strategic approach to one’s own Open Research practice. In this paper we discuss the value of a critical approach towards Open Research to ensure better coherence between ‘open’ ideology (embodied in strategic intention) and ‘open’ practice (the everyday operationalisation of open principles). This paper first appeared in Open Praxis, Volume 8 Number 2. DA - 2016 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Open Praxis LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2016 T1 - Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project TI - Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23328 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23328 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | King T, Hodgkinson-Williams C, Willmers M, Walji S. Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project. Open Praxis. 2016; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/23328. | en_ZA |
| dc.language | eng | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Open Praxis | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | en_ZA |
| dc.source | Open Praxis | en_ZA |
| dc.source.uri | http://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/index | |
| dc.subject.other | openness | |
| dc.subject.other | open educational resources | |
| dc.subject.other | open research | |
| dc.subject.other | iterative | |
| dc.subject.other | critical openness | |
| dc.title | Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
| uct.type.filetype | Text | |
| uct.type.filetype | Image | |
| uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
| uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |