Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa

dc.contributor.authorHoward, I L
dc.contributor.authorWelzel, T B
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-28T13:53:47Z
dc.date.available2016-04-28T13:53:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.updated2016-04-28T13:51:29Z
dc.description.abstractObjective. To describe the utilisation and safety of air medical services (AMS), when being used for inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods. A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted for the time period January 2010 to December 2011. Data were recorded from the Cape Town base of the AMS provider for the Western Cape Provincial Department of Health Emergency Medical Services. Patient demographics, flight and transfer details, interventions performed and adverse events encountered were documented for all patients <13 years of age transferred by either helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft. Results. A total of 485 patients was analysed. More patients were transported by helicopter (n=263, 54%), with neonates making up the largest category for both modes of transfer. Respiratory (29%), neurological (18%), cardiac (14%) and gastrointestinal disorders (14%) made up the majority of non-traumatic reasons for transfer. Overall, transfers by helicopter were quicker (median mission time 03:00; interquartile range 02:32 - 03:25) compared with fixed-wing transfer (05:24; 04:22 - 06:20). The overall incidence of adverse technical events was relatively high (20%). Physiological adverse events ranged between 2% and 16% overall depending on the variable measured. The incidence of cardiac/respiratory arrest and endotracheal tube obstruction/dislocation was low (<2%). Emergency intubation and desaturation >10% from baseline were the most common critical adverse events encountered (6%). Conclusion. Current utilisation of the AMS for paediatric inter-facility transfer is relatively high, at ~25%. Across both the helicopter and fixed-wing platforms, patients with a diverse range of pathologies of equally varying severities were transferred. The adverse events observed were found to be lower than those of trials examining non-specialised paediatric transfer, and were comparable to those seen with transfer by specialised paediatric retrieval teams. The AMS remain a safe and viable alternative to non-specialised paediatric transfer, and may serve as a potential alternative to specialised paediatric transfer in the Western Cape.en_ZA
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7196/sajch.702
dc.identifier.apacitationHoward, I. L., & Welzel, T. B. (2014). Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa. <i>South African Journal of Child Health</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19301en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationHoward, I L, and T B Welzel "Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa." <i>South African Journal of Child Health</i> (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19301en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHoward, I. L., & Welzel, T. B. (2015). Current practice of air medical services in interfacility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Child Health, 8(4), 143-148.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1994-3032en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Howard, I L AU - Welzel, T B AB - Objective. To describe the utilisation and safety of air medical services (AMS), when being used for inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods. A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted for the time period January 2010 to December 2011. Data were recorded from the Cape Town base of the AMS provider for the Western Cape Provincial Department of Health Emergency Medical Services. Patient demographics, flight and transfer details, interventions performed and adverse events encountered were documented for all patients <13 years of age transferred by either helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft. Results. A total of 485 patients was analysed. More patients were transported by helicopter (n=263, 54%), with neonates making up the largest category for both modes of transfer. Respiratory (29%), neurological (18%), cardiac (14%) and gastrointestinal disorders (14%) made up the majority of non-traumatic reasons for transfer. Overall, transfers by helicopter were quicker (median mission time 03:00; interquartile range 02:32 - 03:25) compared with fixed-wing transfer (05:24; 04:22 - 06:20). The overall incidence of adverse technical events was relatively high (20%). Physiological adverse events ranged between 2% and 16% overall depending on the variable measured. The incidence of cardiac/respiratory arrest and endotracheal tube obstruction/dislocation was low (<2%). Emergency intubation and desaturation >10% from baseline were the most common critical adverse events encountered (6%). Conclusion. Current utilisation of the AMS for paediatric inter-facility transfer is relatively high, at ~25%. Across both the helicopter and fixed-wing platforms, patients with a diverse range of pathologies of equally varying severities were transferred. The adverse events observed were found to be lower than those of trials examining non-specialised paediatric transfer, and were comparable to those seen with transfer by specialised paediatric retrieval teams. The AMS remain a safe and viable alternative to non-specialised paediatric transfer, and may serve as a potential alternative to specialised paediatric transfer in the Western Cape. DA - 2014 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal of Child Health LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2014 SM - 1994-3032 T1 - Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa TI - Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19301 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/19301
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sajch.org.za/index.php/SAJCH/article/view/702
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationHoward IL, Welzel TB. Current practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africa. South African Journal of Child Health. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19301.en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Groupen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDivision of Emergency Medicineen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_ZA
dc.sourceSouth African Journal of Child Healthen_ZA
dc.source.urihttp://www.sajch.org.za/index.php/SAJCH
dc.subject.otheremergency services
dc.subject.otherair medical services
dc.subject.otherinterfacility transfer
dc.subject.otherpaediatric
dc.titleCurrent practice of air medical services in inter-facility transfers of paediatric patients in the Western Cape Province South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Howard_MedicalServices_2014.pdf
Size:
634.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections