Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite
dc.contributor.advisor | Reid, A M | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Garvie, Owen George | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-18T11:30:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-18T11:30:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1981 | en_ZA |
dc.description | Bibliography: p. 118-132. | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | The examination and interpretation of surface features on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from kimberlite gives valuable information on the history of these minerals both during and after kimberlite emplacement. Descriptions and scanning electron photo-micrographs of surface features observed on these mantle-derived minerals from thirty-four kimberlites having a global distribution are presented. Careful observations established the age relationships between the different surface features on each of the minerals studied, and enabled the compilation of a classification scheme of these surface features. This proposed classification scheme is based on the chronological sequence of formation of th.e surface morphological characteristics observed on these mantle-derived minerals and separates thoie which are formed during kimberlite emplacement (primary features), from those resulting ffom in-situ weathering and diagenetic etch processes (secondary features). The mineralogy, structure and mode of formation of kelyphite are discussed in relation to kimberlite emplacement. Pyrope encrusted by kelyphite is commonly found in most garnet peridotites, some eclogite xenoliths from kimberlite, as well as a few garnet-bearing serpentinites. Although the relative abundance of kelyphite-encrusted garnet varies from one kimberlite to another, kelyphite shells are most commonly developed on mauve garnets which are most probably derived from peridotite and are least commonly found on orange varieties from eclogites. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.apacitation | Garvie, O. G. (1981). <i>Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Geological Sciences. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22168 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Garvie, Owen George. <i>"Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Geological Sciences, 1981. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22168 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Garvie, O. 1981. Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite. University of Cape Town. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris | TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Garvie, Owen George AB - The examination and interpretation of surface features on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from kimberlite gives valuable information on the history of these minerals both during and after kimberlite emplacement. Descriptions and scanning electron photo-micrographs of surface features observed on these mantle-derived minerals from thirty-four kimberlites having a global distribution are presented. Careful observations established the age relationships between the different surface features on each of the minerals studied, and enabled the compilation of a classification scheme of these surface features. This proposed classification scheme is based on the chronological sequence of formation of th.e surface morphological characteristics observed on these mantle-derived minerals and separates thoie which are formed during kimberlite emplacement (primary features), from those resulting ffom in-situ weathering and diagenetic etch processes (secondary features). The mineralogy, structure and mode of formation of kelyphite are discussed in relation to kimberlite emplacement. Pyrope encrusted by kelyphite is commonly found in most garnet peridotites, some eclogite xenoliths from kimberlite, as well as a few garnet-bearing serpentinites. Although the relative abundance of kelyphite-encrusted garnet varies from one kimberlite to another, kelyphite shells are most commonly developed on mauve garnets which are most probably derived from peridotite and are least commonly found on orange varieties from eclogites. DA - 1981 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 1981 T1 - Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite TI - Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22168 ER - | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22168 | |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Garvie OG. Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Geological Sciences, 1981 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22168 | en_ZA |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.department | Department of Geological Sciences | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Science | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
dc.subject.other | Geological Sciences | en_ZA |
dc.title | Surface textures on pyrope, picroilmenite and chrome diopside from Kimberlite | en_ZA |
dc.type | Master Thesis | |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
dc.type.qualificationname | MSc | en_ZA |
uct.type.filetype | Text | |
uct.type.filetype | Image | |
uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
uct.type.resource | Thesis | en_ZA |