Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes

dc.contributor.authorWreford, Joanne
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-05T08:56:16Z
dc.date.available2016-05-05T08:56:16Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.updated2016-05-05T08:53:59Z
dc.description.abstractIn South Africa, traditional African and biomedical practitioners operate in parallel, but largely separate, arenas, in which collaboration is largely absent. This paper suggests that any positive benefits of pluralism tend to be undermined by fractious and confrontational relationships between the biomedical and traditional systems, a situation which appears especially the case for traditional practitioners such as sangoma, who call on the spiritual guidance of ancestral agency in their healing work. Motivated in part by the author’s personal experience of training and qualification as a sangoma, this paper seeks to stimulate an intellectual debate about sangoma healing as it relates to the scientific understandings of biomedicine, most especially in the context of HIV/AIDS interventions in South Africa. The collaborative medical relationships advocated here do not deny the technical expertise of biomedicine nor question the commitment of allopathic practitioners to health and healing. Rather the paper seeks to address the risks to biomedicine’s efficacy in the hubris which drives it to remain disengaged from its traditional counterparts. The paper argues that as biomedicine appears uncomfortable with the spiritual aspects of the traditional paradigm, the absence of spirituality in allopathic practice confuses traditional healers, a situation which prejudices working relationships. I will argue that biomedical professionals, rather than denying or decrying traditional African healing, could emulate the few of their number who have engaged with traditional practice. I will demonstrate how a working knowledge of some of the fundamental ideas of African healing and its spiritual evocations - the question of healing and cure, theories of pollution and cleansing, the functions of ritual, the purposes of witchcraft and the healing of witchcraft, to mention a few – may actually empower biomedical practitioners, and enable them to work with rather than against sangoma.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationWreford, J. (2005). <i>Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Centre for Social Science Research(CSSR). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19432en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationWreford, Joanne <i>Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes.</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Centre for Social Science Research(CSSR), 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19432en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWreford, J. (2005). Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and Sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes. Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn1-77011-072-0en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Working Paper AU - Wreford, Joanne AB - In South Africa, traditional African and biomedical practitioners operate in parallel, but largely separate, arenas, in which collaboration is largely absent. This paper suggests that any positive benefits of pluralism tend to be undermined by fractious and confrontational relationships between the biomedical and traditional systems, a situation which appears especially the case for traditional practitioners such as sangoma, who call on the spiritual guidance of ancestral agency in their healing work. Motivated in part by the author’s personal experience of training and qualification as a sangoma, this paper seeks to stimulate an intellectual debate about sangoma healing as it relates to the scientific understandings of biomedicine, most especially in the context of HIV/AIDS interventions in South Africa. The collaborative medical relationships advocated here do not deny the technical expertise of biomedicine nor question the commitment of allopathic practitioners to health and healing. Rather the paper seeks to address the risks to biomedicine’s efficacy in the hubris which drives it to remain disengaged from its traditional counterparts. The paper argues that as biomedicine appears uncomfortable with the spiritual aspects of the traditional paradigm, the absence of spirituality in allopathic practice confuses traditional healers, a situation which prejudices working relationships. I will argue that biomedical professionals, rather than denying or decrying traditional African healing, could emulate the few of their number who have engaged with traditional practice. I will demonstrate how a working knowledge of some of the fundamental ideas of African healing and its spiritual evocations - the question of healing and cure, theories of pollution and cleansing, the functions of ritual, the purposes of witchcraft and the healing of witchcraft, to mention a few – may actually empower biomedical practitioners, and enable them to work with rather than against sangoma. DA - 2005 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Centre for Social Science Research LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2005 SM - 1-77011-072-0 T1 - Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes TI - Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19432 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/19432
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationWreford J. Negotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakes. 2005 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19432en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentCentre for Social Science Research(CSSR)en_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Humanitiesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_ZA
dc.sourceCentre for Social Science Research
dc.source.urihttp://www.cssr.uct.ac.za/
dc.subject.otherBio medicine
dc.subject.otherHIV/AIDS
dc.subject.otherTraditional Healers
dc.titleNegotiating relationships between biomedicine and sangoma: Fundamental misunderstandings, avoidable mistakesen_ZA
dc.typeWorking Paperen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceResearch paperen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wreford_Negotiating_relationships_2005.pdf
Size:
409.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections