Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola
| dc.contributor.advisor | Seegers, Annette | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jellema-Butler, Julia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-26T09:46:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-26T09:46:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-06-26T09:40:24Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Many civil wars are fuelled by the receipt, by one or more armed groups, of material support from a foreign third-party state. Such rebel patronage injects traces of international conflict and international cooperation into civil conflicts, and it often shapes their outcomes. But understanding rebel patronage strategies requires developing models to explain how state patrons select their foreign rebel clients, and such models remain at an early stage of theoretical development. Using process-tracing and original historical research, this dissertation tests theoretical hypotheses about rebel selection by examining American support to Angolan nationalist groups during the first phase of the Angolan Civil War in 1975. In particular, it seeks to explain the transformation in the relationship between the United States and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola; UNITA), which the White House declined to support in January 1975 but included in a multimillion- dollar support package in July 1975. The most decisive factors in this transformation, it emerges, were political. UNITA's rise in American esteem was closely related to the group's newfound closeness with American allies in Angola's neighbouring countries, who shaped the American patronage strategy. It was also influenced by the White House's increasingly ambitious political objectives in Angola. The Angolan case study thus provides support to an emerging body of literature that suggests that rebel selection decisions may be closely conditioned on the objectives of the intervention and on the expected policy positions of other third-party states. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Jellema-Butler, J. (2026). <i>Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Political Studies. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Jellema-Butler, Julia. <i>"Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Political Studies, 2026. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Jellema-Butler, J. 2026. Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Political Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Jellema-Butler, Julia AB - Many civil wars are fuelled by the receipt, by one or more armed groups, of material support from a foreign third-party state. Such rebel patronage injects traces of international conflict and international cooperation into civil conflicts, and it often shapes their outcomes. But understanding rebel patronage strategies requires developing models to explain how state patrons select their foreign rebel clients, and such models remain at an early stage of theoretical development. Using process-tracing and original historical research, this dissertation tests theoretical hypotheses about rebel selection by examining American support to Angolan nationalist groups during the first phase of the Angolan Civil War in 1975. In particular, it seeks to explain the transformation in the relationship between the United States and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola; UNITA), which the White House declined to support in January 1975 but included in a multimillion- dollar support package in July 1975. The most decisive factors in this transformation, it emerges, were political. UNITA's rise in American esteem was closely related to the group's newfound closeness with American allies in Angola's neighbouring countries, who shaped the American patronage strategy. It was also influenced by the White House's increasingly ambitious political objectives in Angola. The Angolan case study thus provides support to an emerging body of literature that suggests that rebel selection decisions may be closely conditioned on the objectives of the intervention and on the expected policy positions of other third-party states. DA - 2026 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Angola KW - American Ally LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2026 T1 - Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola TI - Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Jellema-Butler J. Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Humanities ,Department of Political Studies, 2026 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43403 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Political Studies | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.subject | Angola | |
| dc.subject | American Ally | |
| dc.title | Arms diplomacy, bicycle diplomacy, and flag money: the selection of an American Ally in Angola | |
| dc.type | Thesis / Dissertation | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters |