International normalised ratio control in a non-metropolitan setting in Western Cape Province, South Africa

Master Thesis

2021

Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
License
Series
Abstract
Background: The quality of INR control determines the effectiveness and safety of Warfarin. Data on INR control in non-metropolitan settings of South Africa (SA) is sparse. Objectives: To examine the Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) and its potential predictors in a sample of Garden Route District Municipality INR clinics Methods: INR records from eight Primary Healthcare Clinics (PHCs) were reviewed. The TTR and percentage of patients with a TTR greater than 65% were determined. A host of variables were analysed for association with TTR. Results: The median age of the cohort of 191 was 56 years (IQR 44-69). The median TTR was 37.17% (IQR 20.21-58.78); only 17.8% of patients had a TTR > 65%. Compared to patients older than 50, those under 50 had worse INR control (TTR 26.63%, IQR 16.05-52.98 vs. 43.5%, IQR 23.52- 60.08, p=0.01). Patients hospitalised for any reason during the study period had worse INR control than patients not hospitalised (TTR 26.23%, IQR 16.24-50.16 vs. 42.89, IQR 23.5-61.95, p=0.02). On multivariable regression analysis, participants on warfarin for atrial fibrillation/flutter had better INR control (OR 2.21, CI 1.02-4.77, p=0.04) but the control was still very poor. Conclusion: INR control as determined by TTR and proportion of TTR >65% in these non-metropolitan clinics was poor. Age and markers of illness predicted poor control. There was a difference in control between groups depending on the indication for warfarin. Evidence-based measures to improve the quality of INR control amongst patients on warfarin therapy need to be instituted as a matter of urgency.
Description
Keywords

Reference:

Collections