Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorEmslie, Trevoren_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWard, Granten_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-05T03:53:39Z
dc.date.available2014-11-05T03:53:39Z
dc.date.issued2014en_ZA
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractIn the 2010 Budget review The South African National Treasury announced it intended to create a business environment that would promote South Africa as a gateway to investment into Africa.1 As such a headquarter company regime would be considered. With globalisation and free movement of capital internationally countries are pursuing holding company regimes to attract investment to, and through, their shores. At the forefront are countries such as Belgium, Denmark, Luxemburg, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United Kingdom.2 Following the 2010 Budget review South Africa has now joined this group.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationWard, G. (2014). <i>Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationWard, Grant. <i>"Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWard, G. 2014. Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime. University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Ward, Grant AB - In the 2010 Budget review The South African National Treasury announced it intended to create a business environment that would promote South Africa as a gateway to investment into Africa.1 As such a headquarter company regime would be considered. With globalisation and free movement of capital internationally countries are pursuing holding company regimes to attract investment to, and through, their shores. At the forefront are countries such as Belgium, Denmark, Luxemburg, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United Kingdom.2 Following the 2010 Budget review South Africa has now joined this group. DA - 2014 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2014 T1 - Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime TI - Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationWard G. Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Department of Commercial Law, 2014 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Commercial Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherTax Lawen_ZA
dc.titleInvesting into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regimeen_ZA
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelPostgraduate Diploma
dc.type.qualificationnamePGDipen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_law_2014_ward_g.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Other Theses