Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010
| dc.contributor.author | Butterworth, Doug S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnston, Susan J | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-21T07:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-21T07:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2016-04-20T16:33:45Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | At the last meeting of the Scientific Working Group, three options were advanced for decision amongst at the next meeting: 1) Continue with the current OMP for two years (2010 and 2011) as the basis for TAC recommendations. 2) Continue with the current OMP for this year, and bring forward the major fouryearly review one year for finalization next year (2011). 3) Carry out a simple update of the OMP this year, followed by the major review for finalization in two years time (2012). Assuming option 3) is the one chosen at the coming SWG meeting, specific proposals for the way forward are set out below. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Butterworth, D. S., & Johnston, S. J. (2010). <i>Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19050 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Butterworth, Doug S, and Susan J Johnston <i>Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010.</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19050 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Butterworth, D. S., & Johnston, S. J. (2010). Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010. MCM/2010/MAY/SWG-SCRL/07 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Working Paper AU - Butterworth, Doug S AU - Johnston, Susan J AB - At the last meeting of the Scientific Working Group, three options were advanced for decision amongst at the next meeting: 1) Continue with the current OMP for two years (2010 and 2011) as the basis for TAC recommendations. 2) Continue with the current OMP for this year, and bring forward the major fouryearly review one year for finalization next year (2011). 3) Carry out a simple update of the OMP this year, followed by the major review for finalization in two years time (2012). Assuming option 3) is the one chosen at the coming SWG meeting, specific proposals for the way forward are set out below. DA - 2010 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2010 T1 - Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010 TI - Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19050 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19050 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Butterworth DS, Johnston SJ. Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010. 2010 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19050 | en_ZA |
| dc.language | eng | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.department | Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Science | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.title | Proposed way forward if the working group decision is to perform a simple OMP update for 2010 | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_ZA |
| uct.type.filetype | Text | |
| uct.type.filetype | Image | |
| uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
| uct.type.resource | Research paper | en_ZA |