Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAbiiro, Gilberten_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, Dien_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-18T03:56:34Z
dc.date.available2015-11-18T03:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2012en_ZA
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Globally, extending financial protection and equitable access to health services to those outside the formal sector employment is a major challenge for achieving universal coverage. While some favour contributory schemes, others have embraced tax-funded health service cover for those outside the formal sector. This paper critically examines the issue of how to cover those outside the formal sector through the lens of stakeholder views on the proposed one-time premium payment (OTPP) policy in Ghana.DISCUSSION:Ghana in 2004 implemented a National Health Insurance Scheme, based on a contributory model where service benefits are restricted to those who contribute (with some groups exempted from contributing), as the policy direction for moving towards universal coverage. In 2008, the OTPP system was proposed as an alternative way of ensuring coverage for those outside formal sector employment. There are divergent stakeholder views with regard to the meaning of the one-time premium and how it will be financed and sustained. Our stakeholder interviews indicate that the underlying issue being debated is whether the current contributory NHIS model for those outside the formal employment sector should be maintained or whether services for this group should be tax funded. However, the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives are not being explored in an explicit or systematic way and are obscured by the considerable confusion about the likely design of the OTPP policy. We attempt to contribute to the broader debate about how best to fund coverage for those outside the formal sector by unpacking some of these issues and pointing to the empirical evidence needed to shed even further light on appropriate funding mechanisms for universal health systems.SUMMARY:The Ghanaian debate on OTPP is related to one of the most important challenges facing low- and middle-income countries seeking to achieve a universal health care system. It is critical that there is more extensive debate on the advantages and disadvantages of alternative funding mechanisms, supported by a solid evidence base, and with the policy objective of universal coverage providing the guiding light.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationAbiiro, G., & McIntyre, D. (2012). Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector. <i>BMC International Health and Human Rights</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15068en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationAbiiro, Gilbert, and Di McIntyre "Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector." <i>BMC International Health and Human Rights</i> (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15068en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAbiiro, G. A., & McIntyre, D. (2012). Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector. BMC international health and human rights, 12(1), 25.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Abiiro, Gilbert AU - McIntyre, Di AB - BACKGROUND: Globally, extending financial protection and equitable access to health services to those outside the formal sector employment is a major challenge for achieving universal coverage. While some favour contributory schemes, others have embraced tax-funded health service cover for those outside the formal sector. This paper critically examines the issue of how to cover those outside the formal sector through the lens of stakeholder views on the proposed one-time premium payment (OTPP) policy in Ghana.DISCUSSION:Ghana in 2004 implemented a National Health Insurance Scheme, based on a contributory model where service benefits are restricted to those who contribute (with some groups exempted from contributing), as the policy direction for moving towards universal coverage. In 2008, the OTPP system was proposed as an alternative way of ensuring coverage for those outside formal sector employment. There are divergent stakeholder views with regard to the meaning of the one-time premium and how it will be financed and sustained. Our stakeholder interviews indicate that the underlying issue being debated is whether the current contributory NHIS model for those outside the formal employment sector should be maintained or whether services for this group should be tax funded. However, the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives are not being explored in an explicit or systematic way and are obscured by the considerable confusion about the likely design of the OTPP policy. We attempt to contribute to the broader debate about how best to fund coverage for those outside the formal sector by unpacking some of these issues and pointing to the empirical evidence needed to shed even further light on appropriate funding mechanisms for universal health systems.SUMMARY:The Ghanaian debate on OTPP is related to one of the most important challenges facing low- and middle-income countries seeking to achieve a universal health care system. It is critical that there is more extensive debate on the advantages and disadvantages of alternative funding mechanisms, supported by a solid evidence base, and with the policy objective of universal coverage providing the guiding light. DA - 2012 DB - OpenUCT DO - 10.1186/1472-698X-12-25 DP - University of Cape Town J1 - BMC International Health and Human Rights LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2012 T1 - Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector TI - Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15068 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/15068
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-12-25
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationAbiiro G, McIntyre D. Achieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sector. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15068.en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentHealth Economics Uniten_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licenseen_ZA
dc.rights.holder2012 Abiiro and McIntyre; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_ZA
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_ZA
dc.sourceBMC International Health and Human Rightsen_ZA
dc.source.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcinthealthhumrights/en_ZA
dc.subject.otherHealth Economicsen_ZA
dc.subject.otherUniversal health care coverageen_ZA
dc.subject.otherNational health insuranceen_ZA
dc.subject.otherPolicy optionsen_ZA
dc.subject.otherTax fundingen_ZA
dc.subject.otherGhanaen_ZA
dc.titleAchieving universal health care coverage: Current debates in Ghana on covering those outside the formal sectoren_ZA
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abiiro_Achieving_UHCC_2012.pdf
Size:
170.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles