Psychopharmacological enhancement: a conceptual framework
Journal Article
2012
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Faculty
Series
Abstract
The availability of a range of new psychotropic agents raises the possibility that these will be used for enhancement purposes (smart pills, happy pills, and pep pills). The enhancement debate soon raises questions in philosophy of medicine and psychiatry (eg, what is a disorder?), and this debate in turn raises fundament questions in philosophy of language, science, and ethics. In this paper, a naturalistic conceptual framework is proposed for addressing these issues. This framework begins by contrasting classical and critical concepts of categories, and then puts forward an integrative position that is based on cognitive-affective research. This position can in turn be used to consider the debate between pharmacological Calvinism (which may adopt a moral metaphor of disorder) and psychotropic utopianism (which may emphasize a medical metaphor of disorder). I argue that psychiatric treatment of serious psychiatric disorders is justified, and that psychotropics are an acceptable kind of intervention. The use of psychotropics for sub-threshold phenomena requires a judicious weighing of the relevant facts (which are often sparse) and values.
Description
Reference:
Stein, D. J. (2012). Psychopharmacological enhancement: a conceptual framework. Philos Ethics Humanit Med, 7(5).