Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa

dc.contributor.authorBrandão, Anabela
dc.contributor.authorButterworth, Doug S
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-29T11:22:48Z
dc.date.available2016-03-29T11:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-03-29T11:20:51Z
dc.description.abstractData from the FIMS surveys carried over the period 1992/93 to 2008/09 have been re-analysed here. This re-analysis was necessary because verification of the data resulted in several corrections. These corrections mainly involved differentiation of records that had a zero catch associated with them when in fact the trap had been lost or open or not set. The total area of each Zone as well as the area for each transect surveyed was also re-calculated (see van Zyl et al., 2009). The allocation of stations to Hotspot areas changed in some cases from that in previous analyses. The methodology for calculating abundance indices has also been changed slightly.
dc.identifier.apacitationBrandão, A., & Butterworth, D. S. (2009). <i>Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18352en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationBrandão, Anabela, and Doug S Butterworth <i>Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa.</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18352en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBrandão, A., & Butterworth, D. S. (2009). Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the Rock Lobster resource of South Africa. MARAM: University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Working Paper AU - Brandão, Anabela AU - Butterworth, Doug S AB - Data from the FIMS surveys carried over the period 1992/93 to 2008/09 have been re-analysed here. This re-analysis was necessary because verification of the data resulted in several corrections. These corrections mainly involved differentiation of records that had a zero catch associated with them when in fact the trap had been lost or open or not set. The total area of each Zone as well as the area for each transect surveyed was also re-calculated (see van Zyl et al., 2009). The allocation of stations to Hotspot areas changed in some cases from that in previous analyses. The methodology for calculating abundance indices has also been changed slightly. DA - 2009 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2009 T1 - Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa TI - Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18352 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/18352
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationBrandão A, Butterworth DS. Re-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africa. 2009 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18352en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentMarine Resource Assessment and Management Groupen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.titleRe-analysis of the Fisheries Independent Monitoring Survey of the rock lobster resource of South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeWorking Paperen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceResearch paperen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brandão_Re_analysis_Fisheries_2009.pdf
Size:
49.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections