Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s35(5) of the Constitution: S v Hena 2006 2 SACR 33 (SE)
Journal Article
2009
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
South African Journal of Criminal Justice
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
License
Series
Abstract
In this case the court was called upon to exclude certain evidence against one of the accused in terms of s 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This section provides as follows: 'Evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right in the Bill of Rights must be excluded if the admission of that evidence would render the trial unfair or otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice.' It will be apposite, before discussing the present case, to do a brief analysis of s 35(5) and to refer to s 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, upon which the former section appears to be modelled (Steytler Constitutional Criminal Procedure (1998) 34; S v Naidoo 1998 1 SACR 479 (N) at 527g).
Description
Reference:
De Vos, W. (2009). Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s 35 (5) of the Constitution: S v Hena 2006 (2) SACR 33 (SE): comments. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(3), 433-440.