Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS?
| dc.contributor.advisor | Myer, Landon | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Nannan, Nadine | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bradshaw, Debbie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maqungo, Monique | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-30T13:19:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-30T13:19:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2025-10-30T12:34:39Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The South African National Cause-of-Death Validation (2017/18) project utilized the WHO 2016 standard VA questionnaire, which included both structured questions and an open narrative from the next of kin to describe the events surrounding deaths. An unexpected finding was the significant number of HIV/AIDS-related deaths mentioning treatment default in the narrative. Objectives: This study aims to determine the accuracy of VA narratives in identifying ART treatment default by linking data from the national treatment register with NCODV 2017/18 HIV/AIDS related death data. Methods: Secondary analysis of VA data from the NCODV 2017/18 project after linking with TIER.Net data on ART treatment maintained by the Department of Health. Agreement between treatment default identified from VA narratives and from TIER.Net was investigated using Cohen's Kappa (k), and the sensitivity and specificity of the narrative for identifying treatment default was estimated. Results: Data linkage succeeded for 691 (58.9%) deaths, with 62 (5.3%) cases excluded due to inconsistencies. Among the 629 linked cases, 48.3% were identified as treatment defaulters in TIER.Net, compared to 29.4% indicated by VA narratives. The agreement between VA narratives and TIER.Net was 59.1%, with a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.10–0.24). Sensitivity and specificity of VA narratives for identifying treatment default were 38.2% (95% CI: 34.4%–42.0%) and 78.8% (95% CI: 75.6%–82.0%) respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 62.7% (95% CI: 58.9%–66.5%) and 57.7% (95% CI: 53.8%–61.5%) respectively. Conclusions: The VA narratives were not sensitive enough to identify all treatment defaulters, likely related to the lack of structured questions related to defaulting but possibly also related to non-disclosure of HIV status and treatment. Of concern is the high proportion of deceased who had defaulted on treatment. | |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | Maqungo, M. (2025). <i>Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS?</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Public Health and Family Medicine. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Maqungo, Monique. <i>"Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS?."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, 2025. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Maqungo, M. 2025. Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS?. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Public Health and Family Medicine. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Maqungo, Monique AB - Background: The South African National Cause-of-Death Validation (2017/18) project utilized the WHO 2016 standard VA questionnaire, which included both structured questions and an open narrative from the next of kin to describe the events surrounding deaths. An unexpected finding was the significant number of HIV/AIDS-related deaths mentioning treatment default in the narrative. Objectives: This study aims to determine the accuracy of VA narratives in identifying ART treatment default by linking data from the national treatment register with NCODV 2017/18 HIV/AIDS related death data. Methods: Secondary analysis of VA data from the NCODV 2017/18 project after linking with TIER.Net data on ART treatment maintained by the Department of Health. Agreement between treatment default identified from VA narratives and from TIER.Net was investigated using Cohen's Kappa (k), and the sensitivity and specificity of the narrative for identifying treatment default was estimated. Results: Data linkage succeeded for 691 (58.9%) deaths, with 62 (5.3%) cases excluded due to inconsistencies. Among the 629 linked cases, 48.3% were identified as treatment defaulters in TIER.Net, compared to 29.4% indicated by VA narratives. The agreement between VA narratives and TIER.Net was 59.1%, with a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.10–0.24). Sensitivity and specificity of VA narratives for identifying treatment default were 38.2% (95% CI: 34.4%–42.0%) and 78.8% (95% CI: 75.6%–82.0%) respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 62.7% (95% CI: 58.9%–66.5%) and 57.7% (95% CI: 53.8%–61.5%) respectively. Conclusions: The VA narratives were not sensitive enough to identify all treatment defaulters, likely related to the lack of structured questions related to defaulting but possibly also related to non-disclosure of HIV status and treatment. Of concern is the high proportion of deceased who had defaulted on treatment. DA - 2025 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - human immunodeficiency virus KW - antiretroviral therapy KW - treatment default KW - lost to follow-up KW - verbal autopsy KW - data linkage KW - TIER.Net LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2025 T1 - Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS? TI - Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Maqungo M. Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS?. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, 2025 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42067 | en_ZA |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | eng | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Public Health and Family Medicine | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences | |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.subject | human immunodeficiency virus | |
| dc.subject | antiretroviral therapy | |
| dc.subject | treatment default | |
| dc.subject | lost to follow-up | |
| dc.subject | verbal autopsy | |
| dc.subject | data linkage | |
| dc.subject | TIER.Net | |
| dc.title | Does a verbal autopsy narrative provide accurate information about treatment default for people who have died from HIV/AIDS? | |
| dc.type | Thesis / Dissertation | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters |