Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity

dc.contributor.authorWallis, Taryn
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-17T07:53:03Z
dc.date.available2017-05-17T07:53:03Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.updated2016-01-08T08:58:45Z
dc.description.abstractCriticisms have been raised that psychological tests do not actually measure the variables that they claim to measure. As a result, the concept of construct validity is called into question. This article explores the rationale for measurement criticisms levelled at the field as well as the implications for psychology if pseudo-measurement is perpetuated. The article argues that either a re-conceptualisation of construct validity or the development of . a new form of validity evidence may be necessary, if the psychological profession is to meet the future in an ethical and scientific manner.
dc.identifier.apacitationWallis, T. (2004). Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity. <i>South African Journal of Psychology</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24336en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationWallis, Taryn "Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity." <i>South African Journal of Psychology</i> (2004) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24336en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWallis, TS. (2004). Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity, 34(1): 101-112
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Wallis, Taryn AB - Criticisms have been raised that psychological tests do not actually measure the variables that they claim to measure. As a result, the concept of construct validity is called into question. This article explores the rationale for measurement criticisms levelled at the field as well as the implications for psychology if pseudo-measurement is perpetuated. The article argues that either a re-conceptualisation of construct validity or the development of . a new form of validity evidence may be necessary, if the psychological profession is to meet the future in an ethical and scientific manner. DA - 2004 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal of Psychology LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2004 T1 - Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity TI - Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24336 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/24336
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationWallis T. Psychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity. South African Journal of Psychology. 2004; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24336.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Management Studiesen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Commerceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceSouth African Journal of Psychology
dc.source.urihttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/south-african-journal-of-psychology/journal202212
dc.titlePsychological tests are not really measuring what they claim to measure: A re-evaluation of the concept of construct validity
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wallis_Article_2004.pdf
Size:
939.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections